Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Administration: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Louis Sarwal - "→‎Question: "
No edit summary
Line 60: Line 60:
Where do I key in information for nomination? [[User:Toh Yu Heng|Toh Yu Heng]] ([[User talk:Toh Yu Heng|talk]]) 12:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Where do I key in information for nomination? [[User:Toh Yu Heng|Toh Yu Heng]] ([[User talk:Toh Yu Heng|talk]]) 12:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|Toh Yu Heng}} Per the information I gave you at the Teahouse, if you were to nominate yourself now, you would be rejected quickly. Many participants at [[WP:RFA]](which is where you go to make a nomination) reject any candidate with less than a year of experience and a certain number of edits(usually thousands). You have 35 or so edits and just created your account today- your chances of success at an RFA discussion are just about zero. Just concentrate on being a good editor. If you do, and after much work and experience, develop a need for the tools, other users will notice and offer to nominate you. Again- you can do 95% of tasks without being an administrator. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{u|Toh Yu Heng}} Per the information I gave you at the Teahouse, if you were to nominate yourself now, you would be rejected quickly. Many participants at [[WP:RFA]](which is where you go to make a nomination) reject any candidate with less than a year of experience and a certain number of edits(usually thousands). You have 35 or so edits and just created your account today- your chances of success at an RFA discussion are just about zero. Just concentrate on being a good editor. If you do, and after much work and experience, develop a need for the tools, other users will notice and offer to nominate you. Again- you can do 95% of tasks without being an administrator. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 13:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

==Goals of Wikipedia?==
==Goals of Wikipedia?==
I wonder what its goals are if they need administration to achieve them. The goals of wikipedia that I know would be completely stamped out by this. Maybe this is the reason for the Slow Decline, or the Long Decay. This must also be the reason they need more donations. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Louis Sarwal|Louis Sarwal]] ([[User talk:Louis Sarwal#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Louis Sarwal|contribs]]) 18:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I wonder what its goals are if they need administration to achieve them. The goals of wikipedia that I know would be completely stamped out by this. Maybe this is the reason for the Slow Decline, or the Long Decay. This must also be the reason they need more donations. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Louis Sarwal|Louis Sarwal]] ([[User talk:Louis Sarwal#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Louis Sarwal|contribs]]) 18:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 18:47, 8 July 2020

This is not the page to ask for help.
This page is for discussion of the Wikipedia:Administration page itself. You may be looking for one of the following pages:

See also:

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconWikipedia Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconWikipedia Help NA‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.
NAThis page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
TopThis page has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2019

116.58.200.189 (talk) 03:20, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 03:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My page was deleted and

I need all my stuff that was type up back NewCapitalz (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the place to make that request. Nor has any page edited by your account ever been deleted, not at this point in time. --Yamla (talk) 11:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2019

ChalkaChalaka (talk) 11:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I want to become an Admin because I like the way how wikipedia looks, and keep the good community up! It would be nice to have Admin. I'm online almost everyday, and I created this account today but I have been here for a while.

This is for submitting edit requests to this page, not to request adminship. I will let someone else provide further details. Mstrojny (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As Mstrojny notes, this is not the right place for this request. That said, candidates for adminship are expected to be highly experienced editors, with many diverse contributions across the namespaces. Since you made your account today, you need to spend some time showing your experience on Wikipedia before you request adminship. I strongly recommend reading the information at WP:NOTNOW. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 14:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Module: namespace

Please add a section on the Module: namespace in the part about administrative namespaces. 89.138.131.240 (talk) 12:31, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: what specific text do you want added? DannyS712 (talk) 19:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Communication

Is it possible to have a Wikipedia feature that can read out aloud some of the information to those that can't see or to those that are just lazy or don't have the time to read through an article. Thendokhae073 (talk) 19:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can "constrictive" possibly be what is meant?

"account is of sufficient age or by number of constrictive edits" Surely "constructive" is meant! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgmusselman (talkcontribs) 23:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Where do I key in information for nomination? Toh Yu Heng (talk) 12:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toh Yu Heng Per the information I gave you at the Teahouse, if you were to nominate yourself now, you would be rejected quickly. Many participants at WP:RFA(which is where you go to make a nomination) reject any candidate with less than a year of experience and a certain number of edits(usually thousands). You have 35 or so edits and just created your account today- your chances of success at an RFA discussion are just about zero. Just concentrate on being a good editor. If you do, and after much work and experience, develop a need for the tools, other users will notice and offer to nominate you. Again- you can do 95% of tasks without being an administrator. 331dot (talk) 13:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goals of Wikipedia?

I wonder what its goals are if they need administration to achieve them. The goals of wikipedia that I know would be completely stamped out by this. Maybe this is the reason for the Slow Decline, or the Long Decay. This must also be the reason they need more donations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louis Sarwal (talkcontribs) 18:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]