Jump to content

User talk:Materialscientist: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
91.242.192.188: new section
HSaurab (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 61: Line 61:


Might be time to block his talk page editing.- Thanks - [[User:Samf4u|Samf4u]] ([[User talk:Samf4u|talk]]) 14:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Might be time to block his talk page editing.- Thanks - [[User:Samf4u|Samf4u]] ([[User talk:Samf4u|talk]]) 14:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

== pending changes reviewer and rollbacker ==

Hi I'm pending changes reviewer and rollbacker Can be.I am undoing the fair amount of recent change vandalism and there has been a lot of vandalism in multiple edits, as is now happening in naming with IP vandalism. Rollback rights will make it more efficient to deal with such incidents. <b style="font-family:Papyrus">[[User:HSaurab |<span style="color:#666">HSaurab </span>]]</b> <small>([[User talk:HSaurab |<span style="color:#666">talk</span>]] &#8226; [[Special:Contribs/HSaurab |<span style="color:#666">work</span>]])</small> 17:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:11, 11 July 2020


Hi

Just wanted to say hi. ejajh 10:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello Materialscientist, Pakistan International airlines currently made some changes in her fleet as well as Destination. As EU Member ban PIA from entering into europe, I change the list of destination, and mentioned the current destination of PIA both Cargo and Passenger flight along with reference from the official website of PIA. I hope you will check it and undo my the previous destination i made.

Thank you 9 July 2020, 8:58 pm (GMT+5)

This is Wikipedia?

You said on my talk page... "I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Lady A—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks." Yes, I am new, as you comments implied. I do not know if you intended them to sound snarky, or not, but they were perceived as such (especially the Sandbox comment). Though new, even I know that NPOV is one of the fundamental tenets of Wikipedia, and that Wikipedia removes copyright infringement. Trademark infringement is different? At the very least treatment of both parties should be neutral. This is why I attempted to make the Lady A page have redirects to both Lady Antebellum and Anita White, which is fair and equitable, and is not biased toward one side of the trademark dispute. You have now undone that work, and did not explain why except to say 'you found it to be not constructive'. Is this what Wikipedia is truly like?BillBarnhill 11:27, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@BillBarnhill: Read WP:Assume good faith, one of our foundational site policies. Materialscientist was using a templated response that was designed by a committee to be as polite as possible. The civility problem is not on his end. Ian.thomson (talk) 11:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ian.thomson: Ok, fair enough, and in that case I apologize. But the content question still stands: Doesn't NPOV in a trademark dispute like this require a redirect page redirecting to both parties' pages instead of one party just getting the Lady A page? Bill.Barnhill (talk) 11:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Bill.Barnhill: See WP:FALSEBALANCE. NPOV doesn't mean giving both sides equal weight. In this case, the band is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, as there is very little coverage of Anita White in reliable sources other than the coverage of her name dispute with the band. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 13:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC) (talk page watcher) --Ahecht (TALK[reply]
PAGE) 13:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
BillBarnhill, may I suggest you to read what I actually posted on your talk? Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Nothing to do with original research at all. It's all from the British Council latest Language Trends 2020 report - have a look yourself. So please undo your errors. I'll add a link, but there already is one to the British Council website itself 94.118.114.124 (talk) 11:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding an user

Hi Materialscientist, This user (Contributions) is vandalizing many articles, removing good references and changing them to useless ones like in case of Deshmukh article and changing content like in case of J. Rameshwar Rao and Wanaparthy Samsthanam. Can you please rollback all his edits where ever required, Thanks - MRRaja001 (talk) 07:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Gilbert

Calling David Gilbert a "American Freedom Fighter" is not neutral language. He murdered innocent people and is currently serving a 75-year to life prison sentence in New York.

Jack O'Lantern

All of Jason Macendale's information should be in Jack O'Lantern. 11:20, 10 July 2020 69.121.181.163


Hi, my deletion of the article was not vandalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilario_Davide_III I understand that I deleted most of the article and that may look like vandalism at first glance. But I kindly request you look and read at the article. It does not make any sense. Also, the only source is facebook.

Removal of edit

Hi! How to add citation when I am myself involve? Lol its an event that only in the book that is given to students and parents, and all the other events that has been mentioned also doesn't have citations too. Please rethink and reconsider. Bumi manusia08 (talk) 17:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

I see you've turned off your ping notifications, so you probably don't yet know about Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 July 8.—S Marshall T/C 00:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Block?

You left the block template,[1] but the account is still not blocked and still being highly disruptive even after your block notice. Siddsg (talk) 11:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

91.242.192.188

Might be time to block his talk page editing.- Thanks - Samf4u (talk) 14:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

pending changes reviewer and rollbacker

Hi I'm pending changes reviewer and rollbacker Can be.I am undoing the fair amount of recent change vandalism and there has been a lot of vandalism in multiple edits, as is now happening in naming with IP vandalism. Rollback rights will make it more efficient to deal with such incidents. HSaurab (talkwork) 17:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]