User talk:A2c1: Difference between revisions
→Having trouble with reversions?: new section |
|||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Having trouble with reversions? == |
== Having trouble with reversions? == |
||
I noticed you seem to be editing back in parts of a page that were previously reverted. The reason for these reversions is in the Edit Summary, and the most recent one was for not adhering to a neutral point of view. This means that it is not up to you to ''interpret'' the articles, only insert facts and improve the article overall. Criticisms of your own mind and your versions of explanations do not count as factual or an improvement. If you need more help, consider asking on the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse]]! [[User:WhoAteMyButter|<span style="color:#ffb300;text-shadow:1px 1px 6px rgba(255,153,0,0.6)">WhoAteMyButter</span>]] ([[User talk:WhoAteMyButter|<span title="Talk Page">📬</span>]]│[[Special:Contributions/WhoAteMyButter|<span title="Contribs">✏️</span>]]) 05:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC) |
I noticed you seem to be editing back in parts of a page that were previously reverted. The reason for these reversions is in the Edit Summary, and the most recent one was for not adhering to a neutral point of view. This means that it is not up to you to ''interpret'' the articles, only insert facts and improve the article overall. Criticisms of your own mind and your versions of explanations do not count as factual or an improvement. If you need more help, consider asking on the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse]]! [[User:WhoAteMyButter|<span style="color:#ffb300;text-shadow:1px 1px 6px rgba(255,153,0,0.6)">WhoAteMyButter</span>]] ([[User talk:WhoAteMyButter|<span title="Talk Page">📬</span>]]│[[Special:Contributions/WhoAteMyButter|<span title="Contribs">✏️</span>]]) 05:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)<br><br> |
||
<br> |
|||
<br> |
|||
<br> |
|||
'''An Unknown User is spamming & deleting the article''' |
|||
--[[User:A2c1|A2c1]] ([[User talk:A2c1#top|talk]]) 06:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Yes, there is an unknown user who has been deleting additions to the article. I have put in links and references in my additions. Destroying such a content does not keep information, rather it destroys information. have taken a lot of effort to reference the links as well as issues & problems. This article it appears was made simply to provide limited information on the Hindu Marriage Act. The real issues have not been linked, or informed in the wikipedia article. The links & the so called "point of view", the user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 has stated, the user is clearly not knowledgeable enough of the act on which this article has been put up in wikipedia. My purpose is to add information to this article. It appears that my inputs seem tro go against his "individual point of view". None of the information that was painstakingly linked has been kept, this user has completely deleted the entire versions. |
|||
The user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Harsimaja may have some points which I have understood & was editing that. During my editing, the other user completel;y deleted my inputs to the article. Editing changes are welcome, but the entire article that has been so called reverted back to is an incomplete article & requires a lot of additions. |
|||
Thank You very much--[[User:A2c1|A2c1]] ([[User talk:A2c1#top|talk]]) 06:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:16, 13 August 2020
A2c1, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi A2c1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC) |
August 2020
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Having trouble with reversions?
I noticed you seem to be editing back in parts of a page that were previously reverted. The reason for these reversions is in the Edit Summary, and the most recent one was for not adhering to a neutral point of view. This means that it is not up to you to interpret the articles, only insert facts and improve the article overall. Criticisms of your own mind and your versions of explanations do not count as factual or an improvement. If you need more help, consider asking on the Wikipedia:Teahouse! WhoAteMyButter (📬│✏️) 05:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
An Unknown User is spamming & deleting the article
--A2c1 (talk) 06:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes, there is an unknown user who has been deleting additions to the article. I have put in links and references in my additions. Destroying such a content does not keep information, rather it destroys information. have taken a lot of effort to reference the links as well as issues & problems. This article it appears was made simply to provide limited information on the Hindu Marriage Act. The real issues have not been linked, or informed in the wikipedia article. The links & the so called "point of view", the user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 has stated, the user is clearly not knowledgeable enough of the act on which this article has been put up in wikipedia. My purpose is to add information to this article. It appears that my inputs seem tro go against his "individual point of view". None of the information that was painstakingly linked has been kept, this user has completely deleted the entire versions.
The user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Harsimaja may have some points which I have understood & was editing that. During my editing, the other user completel;y deleted my inputs to the article. Editing changes are welcome, but the entire article that has been so called reverted back to is an incomplete article & requires a lot of additions.
Thank You very much--A2c1 (talk) 06:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)