User talk:A2c1: Difference between revisions
re |
→August 2020: Unnecessary interference on additions on the article |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research policy]] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> [[Special:Contributions/2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63|2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63]] ([[User talk:2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63|talk]]) 05:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC) |
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research policy]] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> [[Special:Contributions/2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63|2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63]] ([[User talk:2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63|talk]]) 05:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
--[[User:A2c1|A2c1]] ([[User talk:A2c1#top|talk]]) 06:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC) |
|||
'''Please don't erase information without verifying''' |
|||
Dear unknown user, it appears that you don't have sufficient information on the subject of the article. I had already put in references. If you think that the United Nations guidelines are so called opinions, you should go to the UN and tell them that. I have added Child related issues which have been properly referenced. Unless you are knowledgeable on the subject matter, please don't delete the information added to the article. My editing were continuing based on certain suggestions which were already provided. I understand that you have more knowledge on how to interfere or delete articles. probably will not do so. Your issue is that your comments seem more of a personal attack & with the excuse of original research or point of view. Please contribute constructively. Please don't violate freedom to upload relevant information. This technique of yours has been applied in many forums where negativity is there. However please don't violate freedom of information on wiki. |
|||
If you have any specific doubts, please leave your comments on the talk box. |
|||
'''In order to put information on this article, one also requires some knowledge base. Please don't make personal attacks--[[User:A2c1|A2c1]] ([[User talk:A2c1#top|talk]]) 06:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)''' |
|||
== Having trouble with reversions? == |
== Having trouble with reversions? == |
Revision as of 06:25, 13 August 2020
A2c1, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi A2c1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC) |
August 2020
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
--A2c1 (talk) 06:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Please don't erase information without verifying
Dear unknown user, it appears that you don't have sufficient information on the subject of the article. I had already put in references. If you think that the United Nations guidelines are so called opinions, you should go to the UN and tell them that. I have added Child related issues which have been properly referenced. Unless you are knowledgeable on the subject matter, please don't delete the information added to the article. My editing were continuing based on certain suggestions which were already provided. I understand that you have more knowledge on how to interfere or delete articles. probably will not do so. Your issue is that your comments seem more of a personal attack & with the excuse of original research or point of view. Please contribute constructively. Please don't violate freedom to upload relevant information. This technique of yours has been applied in many forums where negativity is there. However please don't violate freedom of information on wiki.
If you have any specific doubts, please leave your comments on the talk box.
In order to put information on this article, one also requires some knowledge base. Please don't make personal attacks--A2c1 (talk) 06:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Having trouble with reversions?
I noticed you seem to be editing back in parts of a page that were previously reverted. The reason for these reversions is in the Edit Summary, and the most recent one was for not adhering to a neutral point of view. This means that it is not up to you to interpret the articles, only insert facts and improve the article overall. Criticisms of your own mind and your versions of explanations do not count as factual or an improvement. If you need more help, consider asking on the Wikipedia:Teahouse! WhoAteMyButter (📬│✏️) 05:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
An Unknown User is spamming & deleting the article
--A2c1 (talk) 06:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes, there is an unknown user who has been deleting additions to the article. I have put in links and references in my additions. Destroying such a content does not keep information, rather it destroys information. have taken a lot of effort to reference the links as well as issues & problems. This article it appears was made simply to provide limited information on the Hindu Marriage Act. The real issues have not been linked, or informed in the wikipedia article. The links & the so called "point of view", the user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 has stated, the user is clearly not knowledgeable enough of the act on which this article has been put up in wikipedia. My purpose is to add information to this article. It appears that my inputs seem tro go against his "individual point of view". None of the information that was painstakingly linked has been kept, this user has completely deleted the entire versions.
The user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Harsimaja may have some points which I have understood & was editing that. During my editing, the other user completel;y deleted my inputs to the article. Editing changes are welcome, but the entire article that has been so called reverted back to is an incomplete article & requires a lot of additions.
Thank You very much--A2c1 (talk) 06:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- The problem here is that it's not up to you to describe problems, criticisms, etc. Your point of view on the article and what it means to you isn't what Wikipedia looks for. WhoAteMyButter (📬│✏️) 06:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)