User talk:Choielliotjwa: Difference between revisions
Notification: nomination of List of awards and honors received by Gordon Rausser at articles for deletion. |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 22:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC) |
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 22:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC) |
||
If DDG's only contention that Gordon Rausser's awards are considered promotional and overcoverage solely for the reason the recipient works there, this is completely invalid and should not prompt deletion of the page for the following reason: |
|||
1. The Citation Award, Builders of Berkeley, and Fellowship awards are not given simply because of an UC Berkeley affiliation, but given to less than five individuals at a given year who have distinguished themselves through their work and experience. It is unclear why DDG believes the "ones from his own university don't belong in WP." This seems to imply Gordon Rausser owns UC Berkeley, when in fact, he is a professor there. If DDG can clarify this with more than a condescending statement, it would be more constructive to provide evidence. |
|||
2. DDG does not understand the prestige of receiving this award simply because DDG does not understand the honor process in academia. In other words, DDG does not have any expertise nor the competency to determine which awards are minor. If DDG can pinpoint which awards he considers "minor awards," I will be more than happy to explain why it is not. Furthermore, this is an insult to the UC Berkeley institution as well as to Gordon Rausser. In the future, DDG should provide reasoning and evidence before making such outlandish statements and a request for the deletion of a Wikipedia page with all the necessary sources and citations. |
|||
---- |
|||
Revision as of 00:39, 8 October 2020
September 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gordon Rausser has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gordon Rausser was changed by Choielliotjwa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95177 on 2020-09-10T01:35:17+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
List of awards and honors received by Gordon Rausser moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of awards and honors received by Gordon Rausser, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 01:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
List of selected works by Gordon Rausser moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of selected works by Gordon Rausser, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 01:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Gordon Rausser articles
Thank you for your work in contributing to Wikipedia. However, some of the articles you have created are not encyclopedia articles but are indiscriminate lists with no context or sourcing. Some of these entries could go on his own page, but otherwise it's not meant to be a replacement for a CV. ... discospinster talk 01:06, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:List of awards and honors received by Gordon Rausser has a new comment
Nomination of List of awards and honors received by Gordon Rausser for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of awards and honors received by Gordon Rausser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and honors received by Gordon Rausser until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
If DDG's only contention that Gordon Rausser's awards are considered promotional and overcoverage solely for the reason the recipient works there, this is completely invalid and should not prompt deletion of the page for the following reason:
1. The Citation Award, Builders of Berkeley, and Fellowship awards are not given simply because of an UC Berkeley affiliation, but given to less than five individuals at a given year who have distinguished themselves through their work and experience. It is unclear why DDG believes the "ones from his own university don't belong in WP." This seems to imply Gordon Rausser owns UC Berkeley, when in fact, he is a professor there. If DDG can clarify this with more than a condescending statement, it would be more constructive to provide evidence.
2. DDG does not understand the prestige of receiving this award simply because DDG does not understand the honor process in academia. In other words, DDG does not have any expertise nor the competency to determine which awards are minor. If DDG can pinpoint which awards he considers "minor awards," I will be more than happy to explain why it is not. Furthermore, this is an insult to the UC Berkeley institution as well as to Gordon Rausser. In the future, DDG should provide reasoning and evidence before making such outlandish statements and a request for the deletion of a Wikipedia page with all the necessary sources and citations.