Jump to content

User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 7: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Taylor Wane Article
Line 158: Line 158:


[[User:OhanaUnited|OhanaUnited]] 16:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
[[User:OhanaUnited|OhanaUnited]] 16:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

== Taylor Wane Article ==

Hi, I recently updated the article of Taylor Wane.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Wane

I added Taylorwane.jpg per request of Taylor Wane Entertainment ( I work as the webmaster for www.taylorwane.com ) and it was removed. I understand that it must follow copyright guidelines and would like to know what needs to be done in order for it to remain there.

Revision as of 09:19, 6 January 2007

Archives:

Please add all comments below the line.


OK, thanks-Viva

Hi NawlinWiki< will you help me write an article that will stay on wiki for the definition of "primegun" and "prime gun"? if you google you will find it and me> Primegun 18:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

so how do you know all the footballers in question are not Roman Catholics? or are you saying the category does not exist or is inappropriate. Chensiyuan 08:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the little buzzers page

I don't understand why it has been deleted I've put what company it's made by and I personally think it is pretty reliable. Was it because at the front page there was two links and you didn't know which one it is? (the second one channel 5) please email me about it or if you hav an account on ffstv then use their Private Message system to contact me kindly, 1oooop

Chaucha Link

why did you delete the chaucha link article?

it was relevant for wikipedia. look in search engines and you will see alot of different results. He made contributions to everything...

i could not thank you any less

so i will remain anonymous.

Bob Judd article

Concerning the Bob Judd article.

I did a search for information on Bob Judd, but found nothing at all, so decided to start an article with the very basic of info in it.

I am sure I heard of someone starting an article with hardly any information in it and other wiki users added more information as time went on.

Thanks

F1fantastic 15:13, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help with De Cordova and Silon

I agree that a redirect is better than a delete. And you also managed to (finally) get rid of Silon! Paul 16:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My monobook

Err... Did it really have {{db-user}} on it? There is something really weird going on with this (not mine, I am trying to fix it) monobook, with a transclusion I think. Prodego talk 17:04, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't blank it, I got rid of the code for changing to page titles when the lowercase template was on it, since that is on the sitewide monobook now. Thanks though ;-) Prodego talk 17:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I wanted to ask why do you deleted Category:Roads in Orillia. It is part of the WP:GHR. After reviewing WP:GHR, may the WP:GHR re-create this category, as this is crucial to the future developement of this wikiproject. Please further discuss this matter at: User:Smcafirst/WP:GHR Message Centre, and please note that the reply would not come very quick, as I am attempting to have a wikibreak right now. Thanks.

-- Smcafirst is Glad to serve you, click hereSign hereChit-Chat with meWhat I give at 03:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Meggs (street artist)

That's fine. I won't re-instate the article for the moment. Meggs is quite a notable street artist, and Australian street artist articles are needed. I will bring it up to standard, I just need time. Dfrg.msc 1 . 2 . Editor Review 00:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:-)



Happy editing!!!--¿Why1991 ESP. | Sign Here 02:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your deletion of "Airdates of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip"

Shouldn't you guys read the talk page before deleting an article when someone adds a {{hangon}} to a speedy delete? This article had a merge request and I was following merge guidelines by allowing some time to go by so anyone could comment before I redirected the airdates article to the episodes article and also fixed the dozens of links to this article from other articles. By charging in and deleting the article you just created a bunch of broken links. Admittedly this is also the fault of the guy who added the speedy delete flag just a couple days after I stated my intentions to resolve the merge on the talk page, but I thought people with delete privileges would be more careful. I'm just going to fix the broken links you made now. As for the redirect, I realized that is probably not important since a google search found no links to the article. :) I just thought it made more sense to redirect instead of delete since dozens of other articles linked to it (although most of those just have the link because of the template so I'll be fixing most of those with one edit, whee! :) --Danny Rathjens 09:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magging

I don't understand why you deleted this page. please enlighten me. --Jalad.azadi 13:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

magging

I created with a good reason. maybe you should have read my reason before you deleted it. This was not a thing made up in school on a day. Just because you don't live in Orange County and don't know that this is happening and spreading does not mean it isn't real, or it is fake. please read the talk page or leave a comment on the talk page before randomly deleting an article.

Sppedy Deletion

I did put a hang on at the top of my article 'everyclick' and at time of deletion I was actually editing the page to bring it up to standard, and therefore feel I wasnt given enough time to sort out the article, I needed more than a couple of minutes.

^^^

Thanks, I will repost at some point. I am mainly using information from their site and press-pack, which I admit needs to be edited, especially with all the references to 'you' and to the site-link, and my intent is to put across information about Everyclick and I realise this can be very close to advertising. Is there a way to show that a page is underconstruction so that it doesnt get tagged as spam, or is there a preview button I have missed?


The Legend of the Luscious Limited Edition Lilac Ice-Cream

Less than 1 minute after completing this article I found that it had been deleted for "Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content." I do not understand this as the article was about a film recorded, edited and released on DVD and in cinema. Many other films are listed on Wikipeida and are just as important as this one. I am very surprised and insulted that you underestimate this film and let me add that they actors are not from any collective "company", "group" and are not "unremarkable people" as one of the actors -Gavin Mitchell- has an article about him on Wikipedia! Do you not check!

Nonsense page

I've just discovered a nonsense page created by a user about himself, Jerry chen. It is a load of babble. Delete it--Rasillon 19:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the deletion log, its not the first time he's created this article.--Rasillon 19:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ps: There's still a dicussion page on it.--Rasillon 19:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks very much for reverting the vandalism on my user page - much appreciated! Squeezeweasel 19:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfgang Somary

I 100% accept your ruling to decline speedy delete of the Wolfgang Somary page, but am curious as it seems to me like a clear case of defamatory content unsupported by adequate source material. Would you care to comment further? DaveApter 20:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article has lots of sources and asserts the subject's notability, which means it is not a good candidate for speedy deletion. If there is content not supported by the sources, just edit it out rather than flagging the entire page for deletion. Thanks, NawlinWiki 20:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. The reason I thought the article was a candidate for speedy deletion is that it would be almost devoid of content without the references to the alleged tax fraud in connection with Werner Erhard. I am gloomy about the prospects of achieving a resolution by removing the offending content because attempts to do so elsewhere with material posted bySmeelgova are simply reverted more-or-less immediately by him at a rate that others cannot keep up with. Thanks anyway. DaveApter 13:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete my old user page

My username was changed from WmCliff to CountPenguin, so the WmCliff userpage and talkpage need to be deleted. Thanks. CountPenguin 21:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Foramen magnum and Foramen Magnum

I noticed you were the admin who speedied that nn band Foramen Magnum. Just wanted to let you know that I've added a redirect to the anatomical feature Foramen magnum under Foramen Magnum, since for some reason "Foramen magnum" didn't come up when I searched with the phrase (typography?) "Foramen Magnum". Let me know if this is a problem. --Charlene 01:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Project Invite

P.S. We could really use an admin to go through this backlog too. Thanks, Diez2 16:25, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Pony Mafia

It doesn't be to be seriously relevent, as lonng as it is above average and includes an signifigant animal, or more than one average person (as long as it is not an advertisment). Many things on wikipedia aren't, but my things usually are. People always ask me about it, so I had started to refer them there. So I come home, and it gets deleted again! I've written that 7 times, and only this time told why not to delete it. I'm sick of it. Why don't people delete Alf's Imperial Army? Why is that important? Why are the mousers of the Prime Minister of Britian's residence important? Why is the local band which I am very close to, In the Fur, who have several hunderd fans on both sides of the Atlantic (Mostly in England an America, esp. Philadelphia and Camden Co.), not important? I'm sorry if all my anger is going out on you, but seriously, I have had 5 of my articles deleted without notifcation! Tell me, please, why the author does not get a fighting chance, and tell of their signifigance?

?

Wiki, please email me at Erndogg12@aol.com regarding Ernie Green post......

Deleting Warnings on user talk pages

Where is the discussion on this? Diez2 16:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too speedy?

I was creating a userbox page for my own. I am newbie in making Wikipedia pages so it took much longer than others should. But when I just about to click on "Save Page", you have already removed the page. I nearly lost the work that took me 15 mins. Isn't it kind of too speedy to delete a page?
FYR... here's the history...

  • (cur) (last) 16:33, 5 January 2007 OhanaUnited (Talk | contribs)
  • (cur) (last) 16:27, 5 January 2007 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs) (rm tag, moved)
  • (cur) (last) 16:27, 5 January 2007 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs) m (moved Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:OhanaUnited/Userboxes to User:OhanaUnited/Userboxes: mistitled)
  • (cur) (last) 16:24, 5 January 2007 Sigma 7 (Talk | contribs)
  • (cur) (last) 16:22, 5 January 2007 Anthony Appleyard (Talk | contribs) (uncat)
  • (cur) (last) 16:18, 5 January 2007 OhanaUnited (Talk | contribs) (←Created page with 'I have made a userbox for people whos mother tongue are Cantonese. One more is currently under construction. ==Userboxes== {| style="ba...')


I understand that removing excessive pages is your duty, but at least give some time for someone to fix it up. Remember, it's easier to take things apart than putting them together.

OhanaUnited 16:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Wane Article

Hi, I recently updated the article of Taylor Wane.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Wane

I added Taylorwane.jpg per request of Taylor Wane Entertainment ( I work as the webmaster for www.taylorwane.com ) and it was removed. I understand that it must follow copyright guidelines and would like to know what needs to be done in order for it to remain there.