Talk:Mumbai: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:35, 27 December 2020

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mumbai article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18: 14 days

The wording "also known as Bombay" was accepted according to these two discussions: Talk:Mumbai/Archive 15#Mumbai vs Bombay argument and Talk:Mumbai/Archive 15#Name of the city. While the city has been officially renamed 'Mumbai', it continues to be referred to as Bombay, and Wikipedia documents such usage per WP:NPOV.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Template:Vital article

Mumbai is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

Mumbai has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 9, 2005.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 10, 2005	Peer review	Reviewed
March 23, 2005	Featured article candidate	Promoted
May 27, 2009	Featured article review	Demoted
July 8, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
July 22, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
August 29, 2009	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
September 15, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
July 24, 2020	Peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Cities GA‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India: Cities / Maharashtra / Mumbai GA‑class Top‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is a selected article on the India portal, which means that it was selected as a high quality India-related article.
	This article was a past Indian Collaboration of the Month.

Spoken Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles

Template:WP1.0

Addition of Topic 'Tourist Places'

Does Wikipedia allow such additions? As it may seem to be vague. If I add a travel website in sources, would it be a problem, considering it is a dor-profit owned source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bunny journey (talk • contribs) 18:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

'Tourist Places' I am not sure would be an appropriate section title, and a for-profit travel website would not be an appropriate source, as it could be seen as promotional in nature. 'Tourism' is, however, appropriate, provided the tourism in a given place meets the notability bar (which i am sure it probably does in this case), and all content is verifiable with reliable sources.

Firejuggler86 (talk) 01:44, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 July 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change the cause of death from hanging to unknown as the investigation has yet not been completed. 1.187.212.118 (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Are you sure you're in the right article? El_C 15:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The article lacks a cityscape section like articles about other financial capitals (such as Shanghai) of the world does. I believe an appropriate section for cityscape can be included in the article. Addie666 (talk) 12:35, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Edit requests are for requests to make specific edits, not general pleas for article improvement. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can we add this over to the page's top, Looks perfect and candid, Shot by u/AffectionateMind26 on reddit(With all due permissions and consent from the author)

Mumbai Skyline shot in early morning, Shot by u/AffectionateMind26 on Reddit(With due permissions from the author)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by GuruPrasaathM (talk • contribs) 03:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 December 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The card on the right about Mumbai-Magacity there are 6 pictures where it says

"Top to bottom:Downtown Mumbai aerial view, (The Gateway of India (L), Taj Mahal Palace Hotel (R), Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus, the Bandra–Worli Sea Link, South Bombay night skyline"

Where as it should actually be

"Top to bottom:Bandra-Worli Sea Link aerial view, (The Gateway of India (L), Taj Mahal Palace Hotel (R), Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus, the Bandra–Worli Sea Link, South Bombay night skyline" ZeeshanGhori (talk) 06:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ZeeshanGhori, fixed Prolix 💬 09:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent image related changes

@Ultimateoutsider: This is a GA status article, so you need to discuss your changes and get consensus before adding/replacing images in the longstanding version. And do not edit war. Both Prolix and I find this image that you added here to be of lower quality than the one existing in the status quo version. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @fylindfotberserk i am not editing a war. @prolix is editing the war.tell him to stay away from my edits. i will never edit your article again but in return, i want the same from you guys that you will not revert my delhi article edits

Revision as of 18:29, 27 December 2020 edit Fylindfotberserk (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 163,086 edits →Recent image related changes: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:35, 27 December 2020 edit undo Ultimateoutsider (talk \| contribs) 83 edits →Recent image related changes Next edit →
Line 117:		Line 117:

	{{ping\|Ultimateoutsider}} This is a GA status article, so you need to discuss your changes and get consensus before adding/replacing images in the longstanding version. And do not edit war. Both {{u\|Prolix}} and I find [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Brabourne.jpg this image] that you added [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mumbai&type=revision&diff=996589968&oldid=996584586 here] to be of lower quality than the one existing in the status quo version. - [[User:Fylindfotberserk\|Fylindfotberserk]] ([[User talk:Fylindfotberserk\|talk]]) 18:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)		{{ping\|Ultimateoutsider}} This is a GA status article, so you need to discuss your changes and get consensus before adding/replacing images in the longstanding version. And do not edit war. Both {{u\|Prolix}} and I find [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Brabourne.jpg this image] that you added [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mumbai&type=revision&diff=996589968&oldid=996584586 here] to be of lower quality than the one existing in the status quo version. - [[User:Fylindfotberserk\|Fylindfotberserk]] ([[User talk:Fylindfotberserk\|talk]]) 18:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

			Hi @fylindfotberserk i am not editing a war. @prolix is editing the war.tell him to stay away from my edits. i will never edit your article again but in return, i want the same from you guys that you will not revert my delhi article edits