User contributions for 174.3.213.121

27 February 2015

• 04:5004:50, 27 February 2015 diff hist −39 Pierre de Fermat use of 'amateur' seemingly derogatory; fermat's contribution to mathematics are on par with newton/leibniz. surely solution to 'folium of descartes' absolves him of 'amateur' prefix;pls start in talk if disagree (hope others participate,as i don't plan to

18 February 2015

• 20:0920:09, 18 February 2015 diff hist −172 Nonlinear dimensionality reduction that embarrassing work by grochow has been retracted & accepted as bunkum (http://www.nature.com/news/symmetry-study-deemed-a-fraud-1.12932, study that cited the 'pose estimation' article). however, usefulness/quality of dr lawrence' work still stands

14 February 2015

• 21:0121:01, 14 February 2015 diff hist −431 Mathematical proof Undid revision 646911242 by Gentlemath (talk) nothing on talk. please rebut before saying you did, it makes you a liar. alhazen sucks. archimedes pwns your wallah bro

31 January 2015

• 04:3804:38, 31 January 2015 diff hist −63 Andrew Wiles Undid revision 644686377 by SoSivr (talk) i think sir wiles is back in the UK (https://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/node/13271); don't think this cat is appropriate unless it includes the PAST (if so,revert&sry)

27 January 2015

• 04:5204:52, 27 January 2015 diff hist +684 Talk:David Hilbert No edit summary

23 January 2015

• 05:3805:38, 23 January 2015 diff hist +85 Mathematical beauty Undid revision 643383378 by 164.76.54.255 (talk) the removed line is bigger than your analogy of a "local band";may require specialized expertise, but the truth of the beauty is universal

22 January 2015

• 18:0118:01, 22 January 2015 diff hist 0 Parallelogram law Undid revision 643174515 by 122.163.211.123 (talk) notation becomes inconsistent with diagram. update both notation&diagram if you want to use 'u' & 'v'

19 January 2015

• 05:3605:36, 19 January 2015 diff hist −19 Machine learning Undid revision 643155487 by 69.181.205.163 (talk) irrelevant/inappropriate "plug"

17 January 2015

• 06:5206:52, 17 January 2015 diff hist −323 Playfair's axiom Undid revision 641954597 by Rgdboer (talk) see talk, lorentz loving loser. his transformation is garbage, and you've yet to rebut wcherowi's args in talk
• 06:0306:03, 17 January 2015 diff hist −16 Augustin-Louis Cauchy Undid revision 642834867 by 74.110.178.12 (talk) buffoon.

14 January 2015

• 05:2105:21, 14 January 2015 diff hist +1,558 Talk:John Maynard Keynes No edit summary
• 04:4904:49, 14 January 2015 diff hist +315 Talk:John Maynard Keynes No edit summary

12 January 2015

• 19:4819:48, 12 January 2015 diff hist +541 Talk:John Maynard Keynes →Keynes is a probability theorist by any reasonable definition of the category
• 06:4906:49, 12 January 2015 diff hist +1,741 Squeeze theorem Undid revision 641455051 by 81.13.201.152 (talk) rv vandalism. what the hell do you think you're doing?i'll slap you, punk.

11 January 2015

• 22:1422:14, 11 January 2015 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard fixed location link
• 22:1222:12, 11 January 2015 diff hist +89 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard added crednetials
• 22:1022:10, 11 January 2015 diff hist +3,601 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →john maynard keynes: new section
• 21:5521:55, 11 January 2015 diff hist +226 Talk:John Maynard Keynes No edit summary
• 05:0405:04, 11 January 2015 diff hist +1,603 Talk:John Maynard Keynes No edit summary
• 04:5804:58, 11 January 2015 diff hist +873 Talk:John Maynard Keynes No edit summary
• 04:5504:55, 11 January 2015 diff hist −35 John Maynard Keynes Undid revision 641820930 by Doprendek (talk) one more time and i'm calling a mod you degenerate. stop defending loser economists who didn't take proper math classes. they deserve what's coming.

10 January 2015

• 02:4302:43, 10 January 2015 diff hist −35 John Maynard Keynes Undid revision 641773925 by Doprendek (talk) no evidence that he is a probabilty theorist; his work does not abide by any axiomatic system as far as i know. pls prove me wrong in talk

6 January 2015

• 23:0923:09, 6 January 2015 diff hist +708 Consent of the governed Undid revision 641173055 by 74.138.146.61 (talk) rvv (unexplained removal)

5 January 2015

• 07:0807:08, 5 January 2015 diff hist −88 John Maynard Keynes is extremely questionable as to whether he was a "probability theorist" at all, considering none of his work even abided by, say, andrei kolmogorov's axioms of probability. at the very least, scientist tags must be removed. he wasn't a scientist!
• 07:0707:07, 5 January 2015 diff hist −29 John Maynard Keynes he's not a scientist. and it

3 January 2015

• 06:2706:27, 3 January 2015 diff hist −25 Ludwig Boltzmann Undid revision 640762606 by 174.3.213.121 (talk) LOL ADHD fail my bad
• 06:2706:27, 3 January 2015 diff hist +25 Ludwig Boltzmann shocking omission, again. wow. how can hertz not even be here. like do you guys put your finger up your butt and smell it while praising Einstein's garbage theory that uses the LOLentz transformation (WHAT EFFING GEOMETRY DOES IT HAVE? PLS TELL ME)

2 January 2015

• 04:1704:17, 2 January 2015 diff hist −3 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection Undid revision 640605841 by 174.3.213.121 (talk) nvm read wrong (horrible use of highlighting for "at the top" btw)
• 04:1604:16, 2 January 2015 diff hist +3 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection moving to top, per instructions (sorry)
• 04:1504:15, 2 January 2015 diff hist +1,287 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection Undid revision 640602715 by George Ho (talk) fixed--thanks
• 03:3703:37, 2 January 2015 diff hist +1,295 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection →Current requests for increase in protection level
• 03:3303:33, 2 January 2015 diff hist +282 User talk:Materialscientist No edit summary
• 01:5901:59, 2 January 2015 diff hist +86 Theory of relativity Undid revision 640447870 by Coldcreation (talk) don't try and bury a completely valid and feasible theory that has geometric basis please. deserves equal footing.

1 January 2015

• 00:5400:54, 1 January 2015 diff hist +84 Heinrich Hertz pretty important and shockingly omitted, for some reason.

31 December 2014

• 23:3023:30, 31 December 2014 diff hist +2,814 Talk:Theory of relativity really upset at the arxiv superstars' edits
• 23:1723:17, 31 December 2014 diff hist +111 Theory of relativity Undid revision 640351994 by Coldcreation (talk) uhuh, because lorentz transformations have a geometric interpretation, right? take it to talk page.
• 00:0900:09, 31 December 2014 diff hist +111 Theory of relativity Undid revision 639990988 by Tetra quark (talk) take to talk page. this is for A theory of relativity. galileo's is A theory of relativity. ridiculous removal.

30 December 2014

• 00:2200:22, 30 December 2014 diff hist +201 Talk:Neuroscience →tryptofish's edits

29 December 2014

• 21:0021:00, 29 December 2014 diff hist +1,023 Talk:Neuroscience No edit summary
• 20:5520:55, 29 December 2014 diff hist −1,188 Neuroscience Undid revision 640096734 by Tryptofish (talk) tell me, is katz' 1962 work before 1952? no. plus, even if rioch started in 51, he hardly did anything before hodgkin/huxley's 1952 experiment.
• 07:0007:00, 29 December 2014 diff hist −1,188 Neuroscience Undid revision 639708681 by Tryptofish (talk) stop inserting american bias wherever you can. this mediocrity should be after sir alan & andrew;none of it precedes OR surpasses their study(FACT)

27 December 2014

• 23:4023:40, 27 December 2014 diff hist +3 Maxwell's theorem missing word makes a big difference :)

29 November 2014

• 20:2720:27, 29 November 2014 diff hist +41 Ponzi scheme updated to reflect that there's a new king Ponzi on the block, makin the BAHSTUN BOIZ proud.

24 November 2014

• 05:1205:12, 24 November 2014 diff hist +190 Talk:Minkowski space →lorentz transformation's importance

22 November 2014

• 22:4222:42, 22 November 2014 diff hist +1,128 Talk:Minkowski space →lorentz transformation's importance: new section
• 21:2621:26, 22 November 2014 diff hist −68 Minkowski space not true. http://archive.org/stream/monistquart28hegeuoft#page/288/mode/2up (page 293) he says "lorentz hypothesis IS EQUIVALENT" (does not mean they're invariant under lorentz transformation,cuz the lorentz transformation is BS buddy).

11 November 2014

• 02:3802:38, 11 November 2014 diff hist +1,072 Nuclear reaction Undid revision 633244402 by 158.59.241.48 (talk) unexplained removal

7 November 2014

• 05:2105:21, 7 November 2014 diff hist +1 General covariance cleave is correct-- it was tough to separate (cleave) a geometric theory from a non-geometric theory given that the attention was firstly paid to the requirement of mathematical rigour. geometry can be seen as supplementary

6 November 2014

• 19:1819:18, 6 November 2014 diff hist +337 Ibn al-Haytham No edit summary

15 September 2014

• 00:5200:52, 15 September 2014 diff hist +29 Jean Chrétien post nominal "OM" is actually from the UK (Order of Merit, not Manitoba).