User contributions for Philomathes2357
A user with 1,511 edits. Account created on 15 May 2020.
16 December 2022
- 15:5015:50, 16 December 2022 diff hist −21 David Duke It has been brought to my attention that gratuitously including "convicted felon" when this information is included in the body of the article is not in accordance with Wikipedia style. Tag: Reverted
- 06:5306:53, 16 December 2022 diff hist +48 Fred Hampton It is typical of Wikipedia style to include an individual's convicted felon status in the bio, unless the felony charges were expunged. Feel free to discuss on the talk page. Tag: Reverted
8 December 2022
- 00:2500:25, 8 December 2022 diff hist −7 m 2022 Peruvian self-coup attempt →International reactions: the "who" tag is not needed. The next sentence answers the question.
6 December 2022
- 21:1321:13, 6 December 2022 diff hist +16 Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death Since the 'according to whom' tag is disliked by a couple of editors, and the unsourced sentence is egregiously unencyclopedic as it stands, I've changed the sentence in a way that I believe is more acceptable under basic encyclopedic guidelines. If any editors feel strongly about this, I encourage them to engage the topic on the discussion page rather than starting an edit-war over an unencyclopedic sentence. Tag: Reverted
- 04:4504:45, 6 December 2022 diff hist +31 Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death Undid revision 1125353774 by Beyond My Ken (talk) Unfortunately, general appeals to consensus aren't enough to verify unsourced factual claims. The tag should stand until you, I, or someone else provides adequate sourcing or re-words the sentence. Tags: Undo Reverted
3 December 2022
- 06:0606:06, 3 December 2022 diff hist +31 m Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death Added tag to unreferenced statement. Tag: Reverted
24 May 2022
- 19:5119:51, 24 May 2022 diff hist +602 User talk:Philomathes2357 →Yourself: Reply Tag: Reply
21 May 2022
- 22:2322:23, 21 May 2022 diff hist +492 Hunter Biden laptop controversy →Other press outlets: The article as-is included the Washington Post's initial failure to verify the story, but did not include WaPo's updated remarks. Both points of view issued by WaPo are now included.
20 May 2022
- 21:2921:29, 20 May 2022 diff hist +145 Talk:Hunter Biden laptop controversy No edit summary
- 21:2721:27, 20 May 2022 diff hist +871 Talk:Hunter Biden laptop controversy →NBC News Change of Position - Other Press Outlets: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:5020:50, 20 May 2022 diff hist +171 User talk:Philomathes2357 →Yourself: Reply Tag: Reply
12 May 2022
- 20:0020:00, 12 May 2022 diff hist +284 User talk:Philomathes2357 →Your edit at Hunter Biden laptop controversy was reverted
- 19:5319:53, 12 May 2022 diff hist +355 User talk:Philomathes2357 →Your edit at Hunter Biden laptop controversy was reverted: Reply Tag: Reply
- 06:2806:28, 12 May 2022 diff hist +1 m Hunter Biden laptop controversy formatting Tag: Reverted
- 06:2806:28, 12 May 2022 diff hist +35 Hunter Biden laptop controversy If this word is really as important as some people think it is, let's at least cite a source for the claim Tag: Reverted
- 04:0204:02, 12 May 2022 diff hist +6,313 Talk:Hunter Biden laptop controversy →"False Ukraine conspiracy": Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:1702:17, 12 May 2022 diff hist +1,277 Talk:Hunter Biden laptop controversy →"False Ukraine conspiracy": Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:0802:08, 12 May 2022 diff hist +1,975 Talk:Hunter Biden laptop controversy →"False Ukraine conspiracy": Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:2300:23, 12 May 2022 diff hist +1,026 User talk:Philomathes2357 →Your edit at Hunter Biden laptop controversy was reverted: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:1100:11, 12 May 2022 diff hist +683 User talk:Philomathes2357 →Your edit at Hunter Biden laptop controversy was reverted: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:0800:08, 12 May 2022 diff hist +768 User talk:Philomathes2357 →Your edit at Hunter Biden laptop controversy was reverted: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:0300:03, 12 May 2022 diff hist +632 User talk:Philomathes2357 →Your edit at Hunter Biden laptop controversy was reverted: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:0000:00, 12 May 2022 diff hist +1,146 User talk:Philomathes2357 →Your edit at Hunter Biden laptop controversy was reverted: Reply Tag: Reply
11 May 2022
- 23:5323:53, 11 May 2022 diff hist −552 Talk:Hunter Biden laptop controversy →"False" allegations Tag: Manual revert
- 23:5323:53, 11 May 2022 diff hist +552 Talk:Hunter Biden laptop controversy →"False" allegations Tag: Reverted
- 23:5023:50, 11 May 2022 diff hist +1,201 Talk:Hunter Biden laptop controversy →"False Ukraine conspiracy": Reply Tag: Reply
- 23:3323:33, 11 May 2022 diff hist +2 User talk:Philomathes2357 No edit summary
- 23:3223:32, 11 May 2022 diff hist +1,455 User talk:Philomathes2357 →Your edit at Hunter Biden laptop controversy was reverted: Reply Tag: Reply
- 23:2123:21, 11 May 2022 diff hist +3,651 Talk:Hunter Biden laptop controversy →"False" allegations: new section
- 23:0323:03, 11 May 2022 diff hist +4 User talk:Philomathes2357 No edit summary
- 23:0123:01, 11 May 2022 diff hist +1,714 User talk:Philomathes2357 →Your edit at Hunter Biden laptop controversy was reverted: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:5222:52, 11 May 2022 diff hist −8 Hunter Biden laptop controversy Re-edited. Even if you believe very fervently that these specific allegations have been "proven false", this fervent belief does not justify this level of certainty. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 21:3421:34, 11 May 2022 diff hist +1,097 N User:Philomathes2357 ←Created page with 'I am a regular reader and occasional editor of Wikipedia. I have edited Wikipedia since 2006 under various usernames. Now, I typically make an edit when 1) I observe an error in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure, or 2) I observe an indisputable and egregious violation of neutrality, particularly on articles related to US politics. Over the past decade, I've watched Wikipedia drift further and further from the principle of neutrality, and accept more...'
- 21:2421:24, 11 May 2022 diff hist −8 m Hunter Biden laptop controversy Removed misleading language. The question of whether or not Mr. Biden acted corruptly in Ukraine is still actively under investigation - no editor here should claim to know, without even citing a source, whether these allegations of corruption are true or false. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
7 December 2020
- 18:3018:30, 7 December 2020 diff hist +1,399 Talk:Four Seasons Total Landscaping press conference →"The event drew humor and parody on social media" vs "The event drew ridicule and parody on social media"
- 18:0618:06, 7 December 2020 diff hist +1 m Gretchen Whitmer →COVID-19 pandemic Tag: Reverted
30 November 2020
- 01:2601:26, 30 November 2020 diff hist +1,620 Talk:Four Seasons Total Landscaping press conference →"The event drew humor and parody on social media" vs "The event drew ridicule and parody on social media"
29 November 2020
- 19:1419:14, 29 November 2020 diff hist +49 Four Seasons Total Landscaping press conference Undid revision 991298832 by Aluxosm (talk) The original sentence is poorly written, unsourced, and betrays the political leanings of its author. Although many (myself included) found the press conference a bit silly, it's obviously the case that not everyone feels that way. My edit improves the overall encyclopedic tone of the article. As an alternative to my edit, the sentence should be removed entirely. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 07:1707:17, 29 November 2020 diff hist +49 Four Seasons Total Landscaping press conference No edit summary Tag: Reverted
25 June 2020
- 17:3417:34, 25 June 2020 diff hist +9 m Bob Milne Added full name
- 17:2117:21, 25 June 2020 diff hist +52 The Spotlight No edit summary
17 May 2020
- 20:4920:49, 17 May 2020 diff hist −605 The Spotlight Reverted previous edit. Again, use of the term "antisemitic" is deeply political, not in keeping with the letter or spirit of Wikipedia's neutrality policy, and is woefully inadequately sourced. Please see the talk page. Tag: references removed
- 20:4720:47, 17 May 2020 diff hist +2 m Talk:The Spotlight →"Antisemitic": formatting
- 20:4620:46, 17 May 2020 diff hist +20 m Talk:The Spotlight →"Antisemitic": added signature
- 20:4520:45, 17 May 2020 diff hist +5,561 Talk:The Spotlight →"Antisemitic": new section
- 20:3620:36, 17 May 2020 diff hist −5 User talk:Doug Weller →Re: Your reversion of my edit to "The Spotlight"
- 20:3620:36, 17 May 2020 diff hist +588 User talk:Doug Weller →Re: Your reversion of my edit to "The Spotlight"
- 18:4018:40, 17 May 2020 diff hist −605 m The Spotlight Removed opinion-based political language. Just because some guy named George Michael wrote a book once that expressed his opinion of the Liberty Lobby, does not mean his opinions should be presented as facts in an encyclopedia article. Tag: references removed
- 18:3718:37, 17 May 2020 diff hist +2,808 User talk:Doug Weller →Re: Your reversion of my edit to "The Spotlight": new section
16 May 2020
- 22:2022:20, 16 May 2020 diff hist −12 The Spotlight Removed opinion-based political language.
