User contributions for Rosswikieditor
Appearance
A user with 145 edits. Account created on 5 August 2019.
15 May 2020
- 15:2415:24, 15 May 2020 diff hist +11 Jack Buckby Let's stick to the facts here. The previous editor may know Jack as a former far right activist, but having published three books, he is an author. Wikipedia presents the facts, this is a fact. Tag: Visual edit
24 January 2020
- 16:0616:06, 24 January 2020 diff hist −6 Jack Buckby I note that the anonymous user has returned after being blocked from editing for vandalism. Their latest addition was unsourced, but the inclusion of Buckby being a far-right activist is not unfitting, despite the fact it is already very heavily reported throughout this piece. The addition has been edited to read better and reflect his current activity and previous work. Tag: Visual edit
21 January 2020
- 20:4220:42, 21 January 2020 diff hist +286 User talk:Rosswikieditor →January 2020
- 20:3820:38, 21 January 2020 diff hist −173 Jack Buckby There was no primary or secondary source or evidence for the claim made. Tag: Visual edit
- 20:3020:30, 21 January 2020 diff hist −296 Jack Buckby Undid revision 936915570 by 31.127.66.135 (talk) This information is not sufficient. It has been accurately updated to reflect that it was a speech for the Alliance of European National movements, a far-right European political party, and i have updated that it requires a non-primary source. I am awaiting on an administrator to assist. Tag: Undo
- 20:2620:26, 21 January 2020 diff hist −296 Jack Buckby Undid revision 936914753 by 31.127.66.135 (talk) The conference referenced by the anonymous user was the inaugural conference of the Alliance of European National Movements. This has been added but repeatedly it keeps getting undone. I have informed an administrator to assist with this. Tag: Undo
- 20:2220:22, 21 January 2020 diff hist +198 User talk:Rosswikieditor No edit summary
- 20:2020:20, 21 January 2020 diff hist −296 Jack Buckby Despite repeated vandalism, I have incorporated the claim made by the anonymous user (despite there being no secondary sources to support the claim) and noted that a non-primary source is required. Tag: Visual edit
- 20:1620:16, 21 January 2020 diff hist +401 User talk:Rosswikieditor No edit summary
- 20:1020:10, 21 January 2020 diff hist −476 Jack Buckby Undid revision 936912734 by 31.127.66.135 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 20:0920:09, 21 January 2020 diff hist +394 Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism →User-reported
- 20:0820:08, 21 January 2020 diff hist −476 Jack Buckby Undid revision 936912368 by 31.127.66.135 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 20:0820:08, 21 January 2020 diff hist +644 User talk:Rosswikieditor No edit summary
- 20:0520:05, 21 January 2020 diff hist +57 Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism No edit summary
- 20:0420:04, 21 January 2020 diff hist +527 Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism No edit summary
- 20:0020:00, 21 January 2020 diff hist −476 Jack Buckby Undid revision 936911319 by 31.127.66.135 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 19:5719:57, 21 January 2020 diff hist +428 User talk:Rosswikieditor No edit summary
- 19:5519:55, 21 January 2020 diff hist −1,001 Jack Buckby A report by a student newspaper does not constitute a national media controversy. The term "national media controversy" was previously changed to accommodate this. Instead, the information provided by the anonymous user has been incorporated into the "career" section, adding clarification to an existing reference to his expulsion from university. Tag: Visual edit
- 19:3119:31, 21 January 2020 diff hist +897 User talk:Rosswikieditor →January 2020
- 19:0619:06, 21 January 2020 diff hist +387 Jack Buckby →Bibliography: Updated bibliography Tag: Visual edit
- 19:0119:01, 21 January 2020 diff hist +461 User talk:Rosswikieditor →January 2020
- 18:5518:55, 21 January 2020 diff hist −1,632 Jack Buckby An article by a student newspaper doesn't qualify as a national media controversy, as no national news outlets reported on the story. Resisting Hate is also a blog, and some of the claims made (particularly regarding comments made by Buckby) are not supported by evidence. Tag: Visual edit
8 January 2020
- 19:4619:46, 8 January 2020 diff hist −304 Jack Buckby There is no evidence of the claims made. Tag: Visual edit
14 November 2019
- 11:1111:11, 14 November 2019 diff hist +137 N User:Rosswikieditor Created page Tag: Visual edit
- 10:5010:50, 14 November 2019 diff hist +3,162 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Jack Buckby: new section
- 10:3510:35, 14 November 2019 diff hist +405 User talk:Rosswikieditor →November 2019
13 November 2019
- 23:1923:19, 13 November 2019 diff hist +641 Jack Buckby Buckby being published in The Spectator, one of the most popular political magazines in the world, is literally extremely notable - despite the suggestion made by serial vandaliser David Gerard. Tag: Visual edit
- 23:0023:00, 13 November 2019 diff hist +326 Jack Buckby Secondary source, including Buckby's own book for Post Hill Press, confirm that he is indeed a vocal critic of neo-fascism and far-right violence. Attempting to suggest otherwise on this page is dangerous and irresponsible revisionism and probably motivated by David Gerard's connection to Rational Wiki - a page that smears Buckby in several very serious ways. Portraying Buckby as a supporter is incorrect and misleading given his most recent writing and work. Tag: Visual edit
- 22:5622:56, 13 November 2019 diff hist +274 Jack Buckby Various non-primary sources publish Buckby's work and list him as a Research Associate at the Frontier Centre (cited). Not to mention, Frontier Centre themselves call him a research associate. David Gerard is engaged in a vandalism campaign. This page is full of secondary sources and even more reliable primary sources, which suit Wikipedia's guidelines as being understood by any reasonable person without requiring additional information or context. Tag: Visual edit
13 October 2019
- 14:2514:25, 13 October 2019 diff hist −50 Paul Weston (politician) PEGIDA UK no longer exists. Tag: Visual edit
- 14:2114:21, 13 October 2019 diff hist +1,811 N User talk:95.148.249.214 ←Created page with 'Markota having been interviewed on the Gavin McInness Show or Info Wars does not make her a 'contributor'. Many left-wing (and far-left)people have been intervie...'
- 14:1314:13, 13 October 2019 diff hist −31 Jack Buckby Personal opinions are leaking into previous editor's edits. All this editor has done is add 'far right' every noun possible, in objection to Buckby's disavowal of the far right. Markota is not a far-right media contributor. She has not worked for Republican outlets Daily Caller or Rebel for what seems to be almost a year. She did an interview on InfoWars, was not a contributor. Her support for LGBTQ community is well documented too (she often performs at NYC Pride). She is not far right. Tag: Visual edit
12 October 2019
- 19:4419:44, 12 October 2019 diff hist +4 Jack Buckby neo-fascism is more suited than fascism. Buckby is extremely critical of white supremacists/neo-fascists/anti-semitic activists and, surprisingly, was critical of neo-fascists and neo-nazis even during his time in the BNP. So this is a fair and important thing to include. Tag: Visual edit
- 19:3219:32, 12 October 2019 diff hist +422 Jack Buckby Added Buckby's criticism of Proud Boys leader Gavin McInnes Tag: Visual edit
- 19:1519:15, 12 October 2019 diff hist +1 Jack Buckby Minor grammar point. Let's make sure Buckby's far-right past is present but that personal opinions do not leak into this piece. If he is actively criticising the far right, producing a book about far-right extremism, and has severed ties with far-right groups over their extremism, then this should be documented clearly and fairly. I trust other editors will maintain this standard of fairness and professionalism. Tag: Visual edit
- 19:1319:13, 12 October 2019 diff hist +415 Jack Buckby Buckby did not run the official Proud Boys page, but did briefly run a site connected with the group. Its content was not exclusively focused on the group, though it shared the name. His involvement was extremely short-lived, as demonstrated by the lack of coverage and content put out during that time. This editor reached out to Buckby, which prompted an official response via social media, reconfirming what had already been said - Buckby rejected their support of far-right violence. Tag: Visual edit
- 19:0219:02, 12 October 2019 diff hist −1 Jack Buckby Buckby's theory specifically references far-left violence, not left-wing activism. Previous editor is vandalising this page at this point, suggesting that evidence Buckby rejects the far right is 'irrelevant'. This editor might be critical of Buckby's work or personally feel he is far right, but the evidence suggests that Buckby has since disavowed the far right in its entirety. Nonetheless, his far right past has not been erased. Tag: Visual edit
- 18:5418:54, 12 October 2019 diff hist −157 Jack Buckby Previous editor wanted to remove Buckby's vocal criticism of the far right and replace it with a reference to his criticism of the left. They are right to include his criticism of the left, therefore I have reinstated it. However, his criticism of the far right cannot and should not be ignored given it is out there for the world to see. Editors should be aware that there is a difference between Buckby's past, and his current beliefs. Tag: Visual edit
- 18:4918:49, 12 October 2019 diff hist +17 Jack Buckby Previous editors seem to want to erase Buckby's vocal opposition to the far right. His history is well documented in this piece in a fair and accurate way - he has previously been involved with the BNP, a far right organisation. This is documented. Since leaving politics, however, Buckby has been vocal about the far right, fascism, and political extremism. His far right past, however, is right here to see. Tag: Visual edit
- 18:4718:47, 12 October 2019 diff hist −1,062 Jack Buckby It is surprising to see editors repeatedly attempting to insert their own political opinions about Buckby and his wife. Buckby's wife, Martina Markota, is a Republican and not far right. Describing her as far right is only as accurate as the media outlet that makes the claim, which is entirely subjective. Markota has never promoted white genocide theories, anti-Semitism, or anything typically associated with the far right, the claim is therefore inaccurate. Tag: Visual edit
11 October 2019
- 01:5201:52, 11 October 2019 diff hist −366 Jack Buckby Removed repetition in Career section. Tag: Visual edit
- 01:5001:50, 11 October 2019 diff hist −424 Jack Buckby Buckby has said he is not a member of For Britain and is no longer involved with party politics. Tags: references removed Visual edit
- 01:3001:30, 11 October 2019 diff hist −2 Jack Buckby Fixed first sentence. Tag: Visual edit
- 01:2901:29, 11 October 2019 diff hist −493 Jack Buckby Updated Buckby's most recent career credentials, tidied up career section, removed misleading sources/claims added by political opponents in previous edits. Tags: references removed Visual edit
- 01:1601:16, 11 October 2019 diff hist −396 Jack Buckby The source provided by the previous editor referenced evidence of Buckby's past political activity, not his current political convictions nor his most recent bodies of work. Having rejected the far right, written multiple articles about it, and announced a book deal exploring the topic of far right radicalisation, it is factually inaccurate to call Buckby 'far right' - no matter how much the previous editor might dislike him. Tags: references removed Visual edit
28 September 2019
- 21:3221:32, 28 September 2019 diff hist 0 Jack Buckby Fixed spelling error. Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- 21:2821:28, 28 September 2019 diff hist −94 Jack Buckby As the sources show, from Buckby himself, he is explicitly critical of the far right in its entirety. Others may well suggest otherwise, but Buckby himself asserts very much the opposite. Tag: Visual edit
- 21:2621:26, 28 September 2019 diff hist −528 Jack Buckby The claim was inaccurate. The details of the law suit are not public. There is no evidence that Buckby was denied on the basis of his "extreme views" (a personal opinion by the person who edited this). Buckby asserts that the visa issues arose as a result of a fake FBI tip/ Buckby has since been cleared by the authorities following the fake tip. Tags: references removed Visual edit
2 September 2019
- 14:1414:14, 2 September 2019 diff hist +2 Jack Buckby Buckby has not appeared on Poland Daily for some time. Tag: Visual edit
5 August 2019
- 19:3119:31, 5 August 2019 diff hist +1 Jack Buckby Previous user removed citations of Buckby criticising the far right. The evidence suggests he is in fact a critic of the far right. Personal opinions are not valid sources on Wikipedia. If he criticised the far right in media outlets, his website and social media, then he is a critic of the far right. Tag: Visual edit