User talk:61.88.9.50

Your recent editing history at History of British Airways shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MilborneOne (talk) 09:13, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United States passport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jc3s5h (talk) 04:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I did!! PLease read okay?61.88.9.50 (talk) 04:02, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

A pronouncement by a Wikipedia editor in an edit summary has no value; it is not a valid reason for anything. Since several good sources exist supporting the claim in the article, the proper procedure would be to go to the article talk page and create a new section; then discuss why the reliable sources which you can supply are better than the apparently reliable sources that are already cited in the article. Sources must follow the verifiability policy and should follow the identifying reliable sources guideline. Jc3s5h (talk) 04:22, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Okay Josh. But again, US citizens dont need a passport to go to Canada.61.88.9.50 (talk) 04:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Perhaps you're confused about US laws vs. Canadian laws. The US law and regulations make it clear a US citizen needs a passport to leave the country unless an exception applies. An example of such an exception is "(i) Children under age 16. A United States citizen who is under the age of 16 is permitted to present either an original or a copy of his or her birth certificate, a Consular Report of Birth Abroad, or a Certificate of Naturalization issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services when entering the United States from contiguous territory at land or sea ports-of-entry". (Found in https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2019-title22-vol1/pdf/CFR-2019-title22-vol1.pdf)

I've heard that Canadian laws are different, and that theoretically US citizens could be admitted even though they don't show documents that would be sufficient to return to the US. But I've never been interested in that theoretical possibility, because every time I visited Canada I always wanted to return to the US. Jc3s5h (talk) 04:48, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Police riot, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:37, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm Thanoscar21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Police riot, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 13:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Police riot, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Police riot, you may be blocked from editing. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 17:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---