Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIIVA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NIIVA

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable singer who doesn’t satisfy any criterion from WP:SINGER neither does she possess in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of her. A before search turned up non notable sources such as this which lacks editorial oversight & interviews such as this which aren’t considered reliable since they aren’t independent of her. Celestina007 (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable singer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Coreykai (talk) 17:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Musicians are not automatically notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia just because they exist — we're an encyclopedia, not a free public relations platform, and the inclusion bar for musicians as spelled out at WP:NMUSIC requires quantifiable and reliably sourceable accomplishments, not just verification of existence. But the article states nothing about NIIVA that passes any of NMUSIC's criteria, and it's referenced overwhelmingly to primary sources and blogs, which are not support for notability. Out of 15 footnotes here, the only one that's actually starting to get anywhere is #2 (Global News) — but it takes a lot more than just one hit of coverage in real media to deem a person as passing WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass the actual inclusion criteria for their occupation. Bearcat (talk) 18:04, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly not yet notable as the sourcing that is independent lacks the appropriate level of depth, also no evidence of charting or being nominated for any accolades that would make her notable Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone voted "delete". 2001:569:74D2:A800:6910:9F64:720F:E080 (talk) 00:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Not notable. --Kemalcan (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NMUSIC demands Jenyire2 07:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. Lack of coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. Ashley yoursmile! 08:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:MUSICBIO. SwashWafer (talk) 17:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.