Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Kentucky, Kentucky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by The Earwig (talk | contribs) at 06:02, 6 February 2021 (Little Kentucky, Kentucky: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — The Earwig ⟨talk06:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Little Kentucky, Kentucky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another one where the GNIS entry is sourced to Rennick. Rennick's Carroll County directory, index, and his finished book all mention the Little Kentucky River, but none mention a Little Kentucky community. Newspapers.com hits are for the river, an event known as the "Little Kentucky Derby", and a suburb of Jasper, Indiana that is, of course, in Indiana and not relevant to notability of this place. Topos show a pretty isolated place along the banks of the Little Kentucky River. Google books results are for the river. I'm seeing no indication that WP:GNG or WP:GEOLAND are met, as whatever was once here shows no indications of having been a legally recognized community. Hog Farm Talk 17:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 17:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 17:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete There are countless errors between Rennick's handwritten notes and GNIS classifications, propagated here by a blind mass-production without respect for WP:V and WP:N. Even if people once lived by this river and called their neighborhood by that, there's no evidence this is a notable community. Reywas92Talk 19:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.