User talk:Swarnaprabhat

August 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.--Chewings72 (talk) 11:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Far from the Madding Crowd, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546 (talk) 03:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability and sourcing

Welcome to Wikipedia. I just removed your edit to Jane Eyre as it appears to consist of unsourced original research. Please read Wikipedia’s Verifiability policy, and the use of citations to reliable sources to document your work. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that your edits to T. S. Eliot, W. B. Yeats, and other articles have already been undone for the same reason. Please be sure to read up on Verifiability policy before continuing. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at W. B. Yeats, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 07:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I second the above request. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:22, 17 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Swarnaprabhat/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Swarnaprabhat/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 05:17, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swarnaprabhat! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 05:17, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019 (2)

Hello, I'm Mathglot. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, STMicroelectronics, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 15:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from User talk:Mathglot § ST Microelectronics

for the case of my editing, have a look at the official page of stmicro esim certified facilities as well as related news on the web. also you can have a look at a pdf on the stmicro related to marcianise , caserta facility italy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swarnaprabhat (talk • contribs) 06:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message at my talk page. I wanted to respond here. First, a couple of things about writing on Talk pages:

Always sign your comments, by typing four tildes at the end of your message, like this: ~~~~. See WP:4TILDES, and WP:THREAD.
If you are starting a new topic, add a section header at the top of your message. The header at the top of this section, for example, is "August 2019 (2)". See MOS:SECTIONS.

Now, about your comment: I appreciate your telling me how to find support for the content you originally added to the article, in the message you left on my talk page, copied above. However, it is not the responsibility of other editors to find supporting material for the content you added; the burden of proof is on the editor who adds new content, to also support that content with citations to reliable sources. This is part of Wikipedia's core principle of Verifiability. You can still add the reverted material back to the article, as long as you add the support for it. See also WP:Footnotes for more help on how to do that. Mathglot (talk) 18:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Swarnaprabhat/sandbox

Hello, Swarnaprabhat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Swarnaprabhat/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Tilha Kalibari of Gaya.pdf

The file File:Tilha Kalibari of Gaya.pdf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused plaintext PDF, encyclopedic biographical information should be in an article and not a PDF, we are not a WP:WEBHOST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 03:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]