The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MPJ-DK 10:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
✓ This article is new and was created on 01:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 7684 characters
✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (10.7% confidence; confirm)
Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
Note: Please note that further to discussions at Talk:Kalanemi, the article has been split into two. But the current article length of the subject article still remains above the minimum required criteria although its less than the one mentioned by the bot in the above auto-review. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:35, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Overall: Passes DYK checklist. Article length of just under 5,000 characters is over 3 times required. Good To Go. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but am having trouble finding the inline cite for Kalanemi being killed by Vishnu, and for Krishna being Vishnu's reincarnation. Yoninah (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
@Yoninah: I'm certainly not into Hindu mythology, but this is the way I saw it IMO and should be verified by @Dharmadhyaksha: (nominator) -
A) The second paragraph in subheading "Previous birth of Kamsa" is this statement that is inline referenced - In that birth, Kalanemi would be reborn as Kamsa, son of Ugrasena, and would be their uncle who would eventually kill them all.
B) The last paragraph in subheading "Previous birth of Kamsa" is this statement that is inline referenced - When Krishna was born as the eighth son Kamsa's efforts to kill the child failed and finally Krishna killed him during an ambush.
C) The last line in subheading "Previous birth of Kamsa" is this below statement that is inline referenced that may be part of it- As Kamsa was killed by Krishna, a divine person, he attained moksha due to his constant thoughts on Krishna.
@Nvvchar: I would like to repeat I do not understand Hindu mythology much and there may be better inline cites that the creators furnished in the article.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Since the article mostly references Krishna, and no cites are appended to the references to Vishnu, maybe the hook should only reference Krishna? Yoninah (talk) 18:39, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
The ref Kennedy 1831 in the article mentioned Kalanemi being killed by Vishnu and Doug has given elaborate refs above of Kamsa being killed by Krishna. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
@Dharmadhyaksha: Okay, I see it in the article with an inline cite that Krishna killed Kamsa. But I do not see it stated in the article that Vishnu killed Kalanemi. It says that clearly in the source (Kennedy), but in the article it just says Kalanemi was "defeated". Meanwhile, while it says in the lead that Krishna is an avatar of Vishnu, that fact does not appear in the inline cite. Yoninah (talk) 20:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
@Yoninah: Ohh... got it now! Changed "defeated" to "killed" in the article. Have added references for Krishna being an avatar of Vishnu. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. All hook facts verified and cited inline. Rest of review per Doug Coldwell. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 08:30, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Putting this in prep 5, but without the picture since it is not a picture of the bolded term and we need non-image hooks. MPJ-DK 10:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
Passes DYK checklist. Article length of just under 5,000 characters is over 3 times required. Good To Go. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
