Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butch Francisco (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:38, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Butch Francisco[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Narrowly escapes WP:G4 and WP:G11 due to rewording and small adjustments in content. Still fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL by a long way. The passing mentions in Rotary Club are not enough as he is affiliated with that organisation, so they are non-independent, per WP:IS. Other references like Wikivisually and Facebook are not reliable and self-published, per WP:RS. Role in politics is way short of NPOL requirements. GNG requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, which is not found here.

Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE including a search of Filipino sources here. Only unrelated namesakes coming up. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Absolutely nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable for the purposes of guaranteeing him a spot in Wikipedia, and absolutely none of the footnotes are reliable or notability-supporting sources for the purposes of getting him over WP:GNG in lieu of actually having to pass the inclusion criteria for any of his occupations. Bearcat (talk) 12:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. FWIW, I've blocked the editor of this article for undisclosed paod editing elsewhere, no idea if that applies here too Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Recreated article. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 07:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Undisclosed UPE, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt: There's another person - a columnist - bearing that name, but neither of them are notable. This should've been speedily deleted since it's been around a couple of weeks since the article was recreated. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.