Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remesh Ramachandran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remesh Ramachandran

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was created by stock, the person lacks in-depth coverage, and the achievements are not that remarkable. The article also contains sponsored articles without the byline and a few contributor articles. Madarphadar (talk) 17:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:18, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly promotional, and the references are not high quality. Three of the 7 references are the same piece from the Deccan Chronicle. The other 4 are of no use to meet GNG; one is a HuffPost contributor piece. Possibly WP:TOOSOON; there could easily be more coverage of this person in 10 years for work done after the present time. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 19:47, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.