Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equinox (organization)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:23, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Equinox (organization)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail NORG. Sources only make passing mention of the initiative, aside from a self-promotional article in Al-jazeera, written by co-founder. I don't see any in-depth coverage in reliable sources. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 14:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 14:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 14:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 14:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The allegedly non reliable article from Al Jazeera reference has been removed and another reference from an independent reputable source has been added to the article.

This page has been already reviewed by user User:John B123. It is not clear why ‡ El cid, el campeador diverges from the previous review. In any event, as both comments by ‡ El cid, el campeador are addressed, please remove the AFD mention, absent other objections.

Hello. Marking an article are reviewed is not the same as endorsing that an article meets Wikipedia's inclusion standards. My concern is that the sources provided do not involve in-depth discussion of Equinox, i.e. the organization is only mentioned and the articles do not actually discussion Equinox. I stand by that assertion. See WP:GNG. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 13:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete I don't really know what the specific notability guidelines for initiatives are. Let alone if there even is any. Maybe WP:EVENT? In any case, the coverage that exists for this seems to be rather weak passing mentions, that don't address the topic directly or in-depth. That said, I think someone could maybe squeak out a case for keeping the article with one or two high quality references. I just couldn't find any, but it's likely they exist. So as things stand my delete "vote" is on the weak side. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.