Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copa América Finals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep: clear consensus after User:ChrisTheDude fixed the WP:CPMOVE. --Tomchen1989 (talk) 12:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copa América Finals

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doubled in context with List of Copa América finals, and now in content. Flix11 (talk) 11:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - as far as I can see, the content of this page was copied and pasted to a new location. It should instead have been moved using the proper page move process. So the best thing to do would be to close this AfD, wind back the incorrectly-done copy and paste move and then just move the page to the correct title properly, thus preserving the edit history -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:13, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- ........which I have now done. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep given comparable page List of FIFA World Cup finals is a FA... Giant Snowman 18:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - due to the work done by Chris, this discussion is no longer needed as the issue raised by the nominator has been resolved. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per Spiderone, but I think it's important someone to add references to the table. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 19:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Enough content to stand as an independent list article. It is also a very informative from my point of view. Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 13:47, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.