Talk:The Breach (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Star Trek C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage C‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

what was the name of the rocks they collected from the caves?

this is also an epasode with tribbles in it

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.15.131.253 (talk) 04:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

cprockhill

Fair use rationale for Image:The Breach (ENT episode).jpg

Image:The Breach (ENT episode).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings

If you look at the ratings over the run of Enterprise it is almost always the bigger networks NBC, CBS, FOX, ABC jockeying for the top places and the smaller networks UPN and The WB some distance behind (Variety refers to the smaller two as "netlets"). That's why it seems more appropriate and relevant to compare and contrast Enterprise with Dawson's Creek than to point out that FOX got millions more viewers and was top of the ratings yet again with "American Idol." Since McNeill coincidentally directed both Enterprise and Dawson's Creek this week the extra emphasis did not seem undue.

Also the fast overnight ratings initially had Enterprise ahead of Dawson's Creek[1] but the final weekly average viewer numbers from the LA Times put Dawson's Creek in ahead (102.nd Dawson's Creek WB 3.47 million, versus 104.th Enterprise UPN 3.19 million)

Please note that I included TrekWeb as a reference not because it was strictly necessary, any objective reader could look at the Nielsen ratings and make the same reasonable observations to summarize the numbers, but to show I was paraphrasing existing analysis. -- 109.76.132.146 (talk) 11:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]