User talk:力停
Welcome!
|
Revert
@Code Pending: Apologies and thanks for the revert, I had not noticed the edit had already been reverted when I went and reverted the article on huggle, thanks for fixing my error! FlalfTalk 07:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
Hello, Code Pending. I noticed that one or more of your recent User Talk warnings, namely AnonymousArtist1900's talk page, was a misuse of a multi-level template. With rare exceptions, multi-level warning templates should start with a level one template, and increase per offense until level four, at which point any subsequent vandalism should be reported to WP:AIV. Your warning template was a lower level than the previous warning, without an adequate reason for doing so. This can allow a vandal to continue to make disruptive edits. Please read Wikipedia's guidelines on multi-level warning templates to make sure that your anti-vandalism efforts are the most effective. Thank you. Bass77talkcontribs 01:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Bass77: the {{uw-wrongsummary}} warning is a single-level warning. Code Pending (talk) 01:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Code Pending: Yes, that is true. However, I think you missed the point of my message. You gave a level three warning immediately prior, which means that you should follow up with a level four (final) warning, most likely {{uw-generic4}}, because the pattern of disruptive editing takes precedence over a single canned edit summary.
- Don't worry about that, though, because in this case it isn't too big of a deal. You're a new editor, so I was just trying to make sure you knew about the policy for warning users. Sorry about the mistake. Have a good day. Bass77talkcontribs 04:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Read talk page
You cold at least read the talk page of the messy article about orders of magnitute, with numerous complaints about its shabby quality, before arrogantly reverting a well intended tagging for shabby quality, with text like "anonimous editor". So sad! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.121.84.11 (talk) 03:03, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- I did read your talk page comments. They were so devoid of substance I reverted the maintenance tag additions. I am inclined to do so again. Code Pending (talk) 03:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- They are not devoid of substance, and it is not just my comments. Most comments by other people complain about the poor quality. Your aggressive arrogant behavior will be reported, if you continue. Watch your behavior! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.121.84.11 (talk)
- You seem to have realized the problem with your initial tagging. There's no claim of "POV" whatsoever in your comment, but nobody can dispute that the article needs better sourcing. Code Pending (talk) 03:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
a comment
"Obvious...." as yourself
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
You do good work! Cheerful Squirrel (talk) 03:21, 5 July 2021 (UTC) |
Michelle Enrile
You don't find her bio notable? Wake me up when twenty twenty ends (talk) 01:44, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- I am sure I don't care. Don't edit war and don't add nonsense to pages like JF. Code Pending (talk) 01:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Code Pending, this is an LTA - User:DeepNikita. Probably best to just report such accounts to AIV and avoid responding to them. aeschylus (talk) 02:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Friend
Hi can we be friends your page is so cool KrystopherNystrom (talk) 03:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)