Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colorsport VIII

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JGHowes ^talk 13:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Colorsport VIII[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet any aspect of WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 18:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:49, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Draft:Granada Electronics. My preliminary research suggests that while this is a run-of-the-mill product, the manufacturer, Granada Electronics, is a notable company. Granted, this is probably more for the company's failed effort to import Spanish-made Cabbage Patch dolls to the U.S., which was stopped by a lawsuit from the manufacturer of the U.S.-branded product, but this could still provide a seed for an article on the company. BD2412 T 19:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: See Donald S. Chisum, Understanding Intellectual Property Law (1992), p. 510: "[I]n Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. Granada Electronics, Inc., the court upheld a finding of infringement where a defendant imported “Cabbage Patch” dolls that bore a lawful trademark (licensed from plaintiff) but which were manufactured abroad under a license prohibiting their sale in the United States". BD2412 T 05:14, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:57, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:15, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Even if the company is notable, this article is not a good seed to start it from. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 23:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not enough references. GamedevExpert^{(Talk to GamedevExpert)} 5:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.