Talk:Triple Crown (professional wrestling)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Triple Crown (professional wrestling) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Professional wrestling Unassessed

	Triple Crown (professional wrestling) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Potential Triple Crowns

It says above the list that all contenders who would be considered triple crown if it was not for the US title debate are not listed. Big Show and JBL were not on the list but John Cena was so I went ahead and took him out since he is in the same boat as them. Likewise, if you were to add Cena back to the potentials based on IC reigns, add Big Show and JBL as well. I went ahead and took John Cena out since he goes against the paragraph before the section. Just stating that its not vandalism, just correction since there is a heavy debate over this page at the moment. KonigBerserk 20:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You made the correct decision. Finally, someone who can use common sense! Everyone else should take a lesson from this guy right here. Cheers, -- The Hyb rid 22:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For those who have not read the archive

Be clear that the US title issues has been resolved. Any edits will be treated as vandalism. This page is semi-protected from the 30th January, leave it a month before requesting an un-protect. Thank You. Darrenhusted 12:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

.well fine dick weed then u change the fact that micheals is now the wwe tag chamion with cena

No personal attacks, and John Cena is in the article. It's called reading; you should try it sometime. -- The Hyb rid 22:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About the archive

Archive 2's link doesn't work; can the person that archived it fix it? Thanks. Anakinjmt 23:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Triple Crown

Let me just say that the grammer, sentence structure, and information under the United States Championship sub-headline (headline Triple Crown) is horrible. It sounds as if people have trouble making a sentence that doesnt ramble on and repeat itself. Not to mention your contradictions in listed people. Also, because the United States Championship hasnt been stated to be a second-tier substitute by WWE, it makes no sense that you would add John Cena to the list of Triple Crown Champions (why not JBL or Big Show?). Fix your errors. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.244.43.78 (talk) 01:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]