Jump to content

Talk:Denis Handlin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lester (talk | contribs) at 02:01, 11 October 2021 (→‎Why is this a glowing puff piece?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconAustralia: Music C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconDenis Handlin is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Why is this a glowing puff piece?

Why on earth is this article written to make this man look like the most wonderful music executive who ever lived?

The thing this guy is most known for - in the eyes of the public - is the allegations of inappropriate behaviour and abuse.

Newspapers have covered the abuse allegations for months. Now we have the Australian national broadcaster, the ABC, running a full current affairs documentary dedicated to these abuse allegations. Yet this Wikipedia article remains a puff piece.

The abuse allegations should be in the introduction, and should also be in a dedicated section. It can be worded in terms of what the broadcasters and newspapers have said about him. Lester 02:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]