Jump to content

Talk:Satoshi Nakamoto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 12.227.66.34 (talk) at 22:18, 14 October 2021 (Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 May 2021). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Right to privacy and/or to be forgotten

Please remove links to anonymous and unverified persons such as Satoshi Nakamoto from Wikipedia. Either they have a right to privacy or they simply do not exist. Hence, the complete article should be irrevocably deleted. I also understand that no such person exists to be sued for losses and/or liabilities wrt Bitcoin.

Adam Back

can Adam Back be added to the list of possible candidates to be Satoshi? sources - news.bitcoin.com article 28/05/2020 https://news.bitcoin.com/the-many-facts-pointing-to-adam-back-being-satoshi/ and youtube documentary 'Bitcoin - Unmasking Satoshi Nakamoto' by Barely Sociable https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfcvX0P1b5g — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a01:4b00:e815:900:59ab:e654:20f6:e144 (talkcontribs)

He's already discussed in the section on other candidates (including that video), to have his own section I think there'd need to be more sourcing on this. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 19:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 May 2021 (Page Deletion Request?)

Articles to this person should be deleted and barred from Wikipedia for the following reasons: - the person does not exist or never existed - the person has exercised their right to remain anonymous - the person rejects any legal or financial responsibility for their actions and their consequences - the person is a criminal subject to current or future legal action - the person has no legal record of birth or death 2A01:C22:C063:1C00:28AD:C882:281B:704D (talk) 23:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's clear this user is proposing for the deletion of this page. To further explain: Submit article for deletion.Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Len Sassaman

Could be mentioned as a candidate, since Len Sassaman suggests it. ghouston (talk) 02:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ghouston: Unfortunately, the source used at Lee Sassaman is a Medium post, which is considered self-published and hence unreliable. Would you have a couple of more reliable sources? JBchrch talk 03:56, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know anything more about it, I'd look more at the credibility of the information than where it's published. However, it's inconsistent that his page describes him as "a strong candidate for the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto" while the Satoshi Nakamoto page doesn't mention him at all. ghouston (talk) 05:17, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ghouston: I have now removed the claim at Len Sassaman for consistency. I was not able to find a reliable source, which is—per consensus—of crucial importance on the topic area of crypto and in biographies of recently deceased persons. JBchrch talk 14:44, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This theory is a bit older, actually, it was suggested in 2013.[1]. ghouston (talk) 09:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]