Jump to content

User talk:KylieTastic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RicardoRon21 (talk | contribs) at 20:13, 26 October 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


View this userbox's documentationIt is approximately 8:45 PM where this user lives (Cambridge, UK).Refresh the time

I try to answer all questions, but I also have a busy real-life - If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Wikipedia:Teahouse

Click to start a Question/section — Deleted image issue? Look up the files history here...

AfC Drafts NOTE: To be fair to all submitters I do not review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random...

Current Backlog: 1,823 pending submissions

 

Thank You for Your Contributions

Apple Pie

Dear KylieTasctic, even though it wasn't the nectarine pie like the previous times, I hope an apple pie thanks would mean a lot to you-Respectfully, User:SANCHO2398 15:49, 10 August 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

Get a CheeseBurger from McDonalds and edit Wikipedia even more Partha Basak 12:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Show Me The Money 10

Hello,

Please re-check my revisions for this Wikipedia article. All sources were directly from MNET's Youtube, Instagram, and Facebook pages.

Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creydadj (talk • contribs)

Request on 19:54:22, 20 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Djscamper


Hi! Thanks for taking the time to look at the Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation's page. This is my first page addition. I do work for the Foundation and I have that in my profile.

I added news stories from Los Altos Town Crier. I also changed the text so that it does not match our website as much. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do. I tried adding our logo, but that does not seem to work.

Djscamper (talk) 19:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Djscamper thanks for disclosing your COI. Also thanks for improving the copyright violation but it is still very close see this with several sentences direct copies. Unfortunate I'm blocked from the new sources being from the UK (ex EU) - however they all appear to be from the same local source. All new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS), and just a single local source with multiple posts is not likely to be enough. Note images must be uploaded WP:UPIMAGE (copyright allowing) you cannot hotlink to an image on the internet. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 20:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Strohmier

I see that "This user is not an administrator and does not wish to be one" Timtrent still believes that the Ashley Strohmier article should not be created. However, I find all 31 sources present to be about as relevant as https://dbs.anumuseum.org.il/skn/en/c6/e174834/Place/Antwerp , which is revered more than https://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/antwerp-population . None of these are mentioned at Reliable Perennial sources. Please explain Sucker for All (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, she literally works for News Corp is on 5 days a week, almost alway as a guest, and sometimes a host, for Fox & Friends First, a show viewed by on average between 500 and 800 thousand people Sucker for All (talk) 20:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sucker for All Please do not misrepresent what I have said as believing that the article should not be created. User:Sucker for All/Ashley Strohmier does not contain 31 sources. Nor should it. It simply needs to comntain the right sourcing to allow it to pass scrutiny
What my status as an editor here has to do with the price of fish is strange FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 20:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! I have proposed 31 different sources (8 were present in the article). Very few of them are considered wiki pages. All are among the different secondary sources that mention her. She's a very notable figure and that's key for all to understand Sucker for All (talk) 08:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Sucker for All the way that Wikipedia works is subjects need to have sources that show they are notable based on the guidelines (in this case WP:BIO). What is not deemed notable is just being watched by a lot of people. Someone could be viewed by millions on TV, but if no one writes about them they are not notable as Wikipedia requires. KylieTastic (talk) 08:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
glamourpath, starsgab, factsbio, bio-peida, wealthyspy, chandigarhfirst, xycinews, biographyhoses, arealnews, informationflare, factualhub and yankeestv are just Among the sources that discuss her.. Could you point to example of other people who are viewed by Millions of people daily, who are explicitly *not notable* ? Sucker for All (talk) 13:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sucker for All sorry but most of those site names mean nothing to me but several look like wikis/user-generated content so not helpful. She is not "explicitly *not notable*", if several independent reliable sources have significant coverage then add them and resubmit. I know nothing about Ashley Strohmier, and but I know what Fox & Friends is so I would expect sources, unless she is new in which case just give it time. I can't think of any very similar cases at the moment, but we get lots of YouTubers and social media "celbs" with millions of subscribers who are not "notable" due to little interest outside of the platform/channel. KylieTastic (talk) 14:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Several are wikis, most are not. Could you direct me into a spot where we could investigate these various sources? Sucker for All (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Could you point to example of other people who are viewed by Millions of people daily, who are explicitly *not notable* ? Sucker for All (talk) 14:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sucker for All there is no definitive list of definitive good sources and apart from what Wikipedia:Reliable sources defines WP:RSPSOURCES has a list of the discussed sources that have been deemed good or bad. There are millions of reliable sources, there are also vast amounts of bad sources. Generally if not listed look for issues such as user-generated, user-submitted (including all PR), paid promotion, and clearly biased sources. This has an overlap with non-independent sources but not always. I generally do not link essays but see WP:THREE as it is widely accepted as good advice. As for the second repeated question I have already answered. However I see from the F&F host list she is just a host, in which case there are so many people that have appeared once of a few times on popular shows that millions see, that does not make them notable. Also I note from her Twitter she only has 4,718 followers and mostly re-tweets so it looks like she maybe just chooses not to engage much outside of her job and thus be less likely to have things written about her. However if you want to have another go do look at WP:THREE. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 08:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think adweek, Columbia Missourian and the secondary nypost (or primary Fox News) would all be considered mainstream enough to qualify for WP:THREE in addition, of course, to Many sources that are not mentioned by wikipedia either way. I think making the case for her being notable is more difficult than noting that she is notable, given she's literally co-Hosting Fox and Friends First for the 2nd day in a row as I type Sucker for All (talk) 09:37, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Abhishek A Rastogi

Dear KylieTastic Can you please check out the new citations and changes I have added to the draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Abhishek_A_Rastogi - Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperpen2824 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Paperpen2824 thanks you for adding additional sources and re-submitting. However to be fair to all submitters I don't review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random, so it may or may not be myself who reviews it next. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 08:06, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Soumaila Coulibaly

Hello KylieTastic. Sorry about that, I'm not sure why the editor submitted the article for revision through AfC. Paul Vaurie (talk) 18:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jazzsteppa: Submission Declined

Hey KylieTastic,

My name is Gal Moore. I was a co-founding member of Jazzsteppa; a live dubstep duo that was active between 2007 and 2013. We released numerous records on known dubstep record labels (HotFlush, Studio Rockers), got radio play on BBC1 & BBC6, press coverage in mainstream media (IDJ, MusicWeek, MIXMAG), and played stages at some of the UK's biggest festivals (Glastonbury, Big Chill & Shambala) as well as touring extensively in Europe, USA and India.

We were the first, and only outfit to merge dubstep with live instruments, and for that got acknowledgement from many other known artists that collaborated with us (i.e Borgore, Untold, Foreign Beggars).

I have a lot of references for everything written above - and was hoping you could explain what you would expect to see in our wikipedia article to establish significant coverage?

I look forward to hearing from you. Many thanks,

Gal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gushgushoni (talk • contribs) 19:23, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Gushgushoni all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in this case we would start with Wikipedia:Notability (music) - see the criteria in WP:MUSICBIO. Otherwise if not meeting those criteria then we would use WP:GNG which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Also note that along with showing notability all claims should be sourced especially as you have a WP:COI. There is much unsourced content including the Discography as the only source is not reliable as discogs is user-generated. Hope that helps explain things KylieTastic (talk) 10:21, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Faberlic

Hello. I translated an article from the Russian Wikipedia. There is also this article in the Polish, Ukrainian and Turkish Wikipedia. In Russian it was more voluminous, so I translated it from there. Will there be time to take a look ? Thanks ! 37.230.234.79 (talk) 13:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi 37.230.234.79 the draft had not been submitted - I have done that for you (and in future you need to add {{subst:submit}} if there is not submit button on another template. However to be fair to all submitters I don't review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random, so it may or may not be myself who reviews it next. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 13:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm MB. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Professor Syed Fazle Imam Rizvi, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MB 19:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
  • On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:09:32, 26 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by RicardoRon21



RicardoRon21 (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again very much.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&oldid=1052002426"