Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohan Lal Lohia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Ritchie333 (talk | contribs) at 16:07, 13 November 2021 (→‎Mohan Lal Lohia: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A marginal case, but there is clearly no consensus to delete the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohan Lal Lohia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Less notable father of a more notable son - attempted notability by reverse inheritance. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I'm not seeing any in-depth reliable online English sources, though I don't know the local language. There does seem to be scope for creating an article about the family, to which this could be redirected. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep... Co-founded a significant company [1], and is named in the Panama papers. Whispyhistory (talk) 15:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd thought that WP:INHERITORG also meant that individuals do not inherit notability from companies - and that individual notability still needs to stand on its own two feet of the basis of significant, independent and secondary coverage. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:23, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:40, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.