Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air France Flight 072 (1993)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Air France Flight 072 (1993)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable aviation incident. Runway overruns are very common. Aircraft was returned to service. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't even pass the WP:AIRCRASH essay. No evidence of deaths, the plane being a write-off, or law/regulation changes. FOARP (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Notification of the existence of this AfD has been made at WikiProject Aviation and WikiProject Aircraft, within whose scope this article falls. - Ahunt (talk) 13:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteNo casualties, no hull loss, no assertion that anything was changed as a result...no notability.TheLongTone (talk) 15:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not only fails our project normal inclusion criteria requiring either deaths or hull loss, but no WP:LASTING effects in terms of airworthiness directives, changes in procedures or anything else. Very similar to a single car "fender-bender". - Ahunt (talk) 15:14, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is a minor accident, e.g. WP:AIRCRASH. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:44, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, this is a minor accident that just happened to involve a large aircraft, and it can be adequately summarized in the article about Faa'a International Airport. Carguychris (talk) 14:58, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to this being (thankfully, to be sure) a minor aviation accident.TH1980 (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per other comments, fails WP:AIRCRASH (not a hull lost, no injuries or fatalities, and no changes to regulations, procedures, or processes) 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 17:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Though personally I would like to keep this article, this has no known notabilty or anything revelant so it fails several notability guidelines. KlientNo.1 (talk) 02:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:AIRCRASH.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.