Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – All bar one of the edits to this article since mid-December have been by sock accounts of prolific sockpuppet User:Politialguru. This seems to be one the favourite articles for his/her trademark wikifiddling. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Question: 10mmsocket, can you point to a recent disruptive edit by a confirmed user that would justify going straight to WP:ECP from none without trying WP:SEMI first? And can explain the connection of that blocked user to any one account in that page? That is not immediately evident, either. El_C 11:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: User continuously undoes changes we've made Lumberdev (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Who are "we"?--Ymblanter (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This appears to be a long-running occasional dispute over minor style issues, such as what order to list the principal people or how much prominence to give them. Take it to the talk page, please. MelanieN (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: there is an edit that does not include the source or reference Ms.semut (talk) 18:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Infinite protection from trolls, false information, and defamation of a living person. KatyKate81452 (talk) 20:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:27, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. The Arbitration Committee says that articles with Jewish history get Extended protection. Yodas henchman (talk) 21:17, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent IP edit warring. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk Edits 01:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AK965 (talk) 01:44, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs persistently classifying this as an "epic" film without providing sourcing. DonIago (talk) 03:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. HurricaneEdgar 03:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing nationalist edit warring. No one questions that this dish was invented in Ohio, yet for some reason the lineage of the person or persons who invented it is worth edit warring over again and again. I tried a brief full protection but that didn't stop it, would a prefer a totally uninvolved admin decide what to do next. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Indefinitely semi protection: Persistent --- Vandalism (Check here [1]) (63.143.196.64 (talk) 03:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC))
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. significant volume of anonymous IP edits specifically reverting / editing good faith additions that reflect users legal issues. BonaFide88 (talk) 04:50, 7 January 2022 (UTC)