User talk:Lcavinder4848

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Lcavinder4848 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I realized my mistake and will make sure that any future edits are made are of trusted sources. I would ask for another chance. Lcavinder4848 (talk) 21:37, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I realized my mistake and will make sure that any future edits are made are of trusted sources. I would ask for another chance. [[User:Lcavinder4848|Lcavinder4848]] ([[User talk:Lcavinder4848#top|talk]]) 21:37, 8 January 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I realized my mistake and will make sure that any future edits are made are of trusted sources. I would ask for another chance. [[User:Lcavinder4848|Lcavinder4848]] ([[User talk:Lcavinder4848#top|talk]]) 21:37, 8 January 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I realized my mistake and will make sure that any future edits are made are of trusted sources. I would ask for another chance. [[User:Lcavinder4848|Lcavinder4848]] ([[User talk:Lcavinder4848#top|talk]]) 21:37, 8 January 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Speedy deletion nomination of Leo Cavinder

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Leo Cavinder, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Shih ^Talk 02:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lcavinder4848 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Contributions made in 2017 on this account were correcting information for Fort Wayne Community Schools. In no way was being promotions on the page. I was unable to get into this account, Lcavinder4848, and make a new account. I did not know that making a new account was in violation of the Rules. I marked the new account, Lcavinder48481, as retied as I was able to get into my old account. I would ask that my old account, Lcavinder4848 be unblocked and my edits from four years ago show no sign of promoting anything. I would also ask for the deletion of my newer account Lcavinder 48481, as it is no longer used. I have read the full Rules of Wikipedia and understand them.Lcavinder4848 (talk) 20:35, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm an administrator and I haven't read the full rules(there are a lot, more than you probably think). It isn't necessary for you to read every rule, but you should know a little about ones relevant to your editing. Accounts cannot be deleted, simply abandon the other account. I'm usually inclined to see users who may have misbehaved when they were younger have another chance, but you did not mention that you created a hoax article about a fake school district. I think that we will need some idea about what edits you wish to make before we consider unblocking you. I am declining your request, but you may make another for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 10:23, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lcavinder4848 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I appreciate the response. Yes, there was a hoax article because I believed it was a real school district. Once it was found out, it was deleted. I would make edits on education pages that I have information on. Lcavinder4848 (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've demonstrated that you cannot be trusted to edit in that subject area, as you don't understand what's real and what's hoax. Yamla (talk) 21:33, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.