Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohan Prasad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rohan Prasad

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable youth footballer. Fails WP:NFOOTY. The only reference provided does not return a result. Searching the source site for Rohan Prasad only returns high school teams. Cabayi (talk) 13:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is not notable and does not pass either WP:GNG.--Tysska (talk) 14:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails NFOOTY and GNG.--Mvqr (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This is eligible for A7, there is no credible claim of significance there - the random IP removing the tag that the author removed multiple times is rather suspect... Girth Summit _(blether) 16:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per User:Reviewing Footballers. SN54129 16:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's a strange reason, since Reviewing Footballers is the one fighting for this article. Geschichte (talk) 06:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet any Wikipedia guideline. Any further single-purpose accounts showing up to remove the AFD template from this article, will be blocked indefinitely on sight. Geschichte (talk) 06:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NFOOTY. Lack of coverage in Media. Every footballer cannot have a Wikipedia article. This is not social media. Venkat TL (talk) 11:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find any WP:SIGCOV, no claim to notability Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails all Wikipedia notability guideline Footy777 (talk) 19:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 19:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete since the person clearly fails Fails WP:NFOOTY, WP:GNG, WP:NFOOTBALL Etc. Etc. and I really doubt this will be kept since there's zero keep votes. So it might as well be snow deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails both WP:GNG & WP:NFOOTY Juggyevil (talk) 15:42, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, per all comments above and nomination. It's snowing hard here. Spf121188 (talk) 15:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I concur with all above. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. GauchoDude (talk) 14:00, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.