Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crypto Valley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. COATRACK and POV Fork. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Crypto Valley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Branding exercise / advertisement for Zug. Batternut (talk) 18:53, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 21:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 21:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IF YOU WANT TO DELETE, DELETE IT, I WILL CERTAINLY DONT WAST TIME WITH THAT. I HOPE THERE IS A BIG PROBLEM OF BIT SPACE ON HARDWARE AND I HOPE THIS REMOVAL WILL HELP TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.237.231.60 (talk) 21:47, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The WMF has plenty of room on its servers, don't worry. L3X1 Be a New Page Patroller!(distænt write) 03:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I added some references to this article from BBC, Bloomberg, CNBC, The Straits Times and Reuters. The term seems frequently used by independent third party sources. Other tech clusters such as Silicon Fen and Silicon Glen have articles and I don't see too much of an issue in keeping this particular article, particularly given the a number of notable blockchain businesses and start-ups clustered in this locale. --Uhooep (talk) 22:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some tech clusters have articles, others don't e.g. Silicon Spa (which also has local council support, and an official website etc). WP:OTHERSTUFF is an argument to avoid at AfD. Widefox; talk 22:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Zug or Delete - lead is clear this is nickname for Zug, so a WP:POVFORK of Zug and a synonym that should redirect to the place, say in a section covering this aspect. I also have reservations that this is promotionalism, and recentism created by an WP:SPA. As such, WP:NOT promo applies and may be deleted even if a look at sources indicate this has coverage for the concept. Note it's also a WP:COATRACK for Crypto Valley Association which presumably isn't notable per NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Widefox; talk 21:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there's many WP:SPAs and a current WP:COIN covering editor(s) here. Widefox; talk 21:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it's not an official or even a common name for this area, The article only seems to be there to advertise technology companies. This is not a notable neologism. Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 15:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge: The lead of this article states, nickname for Zug that can be covered in the lead and a section of that article. I suppose merge can be an alternative because hopefully some of the 14 references can be used on the horribly sourced (23 references) 3891 word Zug article. It can't hurt. Otr500 (talk) 01:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.