Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reuben Doctora Jr.
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:04, 1 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:04, 1 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 06:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Reuben Doctora Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was that the article fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. PROD was contested by the articles creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:35, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:37, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for the reasons given in the nomination. It should be noted that the article's creator has since replaced this page with a redirect to Ruben Doctora, which has been PRODed for the same reasons.
I'd expect that PROD to be contested so it may be necessary to bundle that page with this AfD.★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 18:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Scratch that, it's been speedied. ★ Bald Zebra ★ talk 09:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unfortunately, the UFL isn't a fully-professional league yet (it's only semi-professional, although its fanbase is growing), and as such, he fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:03, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.