Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protea Glen Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 14:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protea Glen Mall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffrd10 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 26 January 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Currently there is no "evidence of notability" in the article itself, but I see a slew of South Africa media reports on it.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 18:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Even just a couple of independent sources I found after a few seconds, one from the The Sowetan and one from the Parliament of South Africa, indicating significant coverage and passing WP:GNG. [1][2]--Oakshade (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.