Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Crowley
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:02, 3 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:02, 3 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Good Omens. I too saw no reason to delete prior to redirecting; we'll just keep an eye on it. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 05:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Anthony Crowley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Nonnotable by itself, and completely unsourced article on character from the book Good Omens. Cirt (talk) 00:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, then reinstate as a redirect to Good Omens. Being a sourceless, excessively lengthy, biography of a fictional character who appears in just one book, this article is almost certain to be kept but I think those are good reasons to delete. Reyk YO! 01:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect I see no reason to delete prior to redirecting. If the redirect has trouble sticking, the redirect can be protected. - Mgm|(talk) 09:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.