Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recurring segments from Tosh.0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recurring segments from Tosh.0

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. This article is one large WP:TRIVIA section, and fails our notability requirements because it is sourced only to the show itself. It is also overflowing with WP:OR. Reyk _YO! 01:10, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Tosh.0. Erpert (let's talk about it) 02:14, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication that any individual segment or the overall concepts of segments of this series are notable separately or together. No one will ever search for this term so there is no need to redirect. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 00:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is a fork of the Tosh.0 page (can be found at this revision) and clearly is meant to parallel the Recurring segments on The Colbert Report article. Fishal (talk) 03:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nomination. Would be better on something like TVTropes. Bob talk 01:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.