Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PARADOX (research network)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:05, 3 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 09:05, 3 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Given the completely unsourced state of the article, and the fact that in over 3 weeks, not one source has been provided, the delete side carries the day. Courcelles 18:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- PARADOX (research network) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable fine art education outreach organization. Was unable to find any sources to establish notability, including Google News, EBSCOhost and InfoTrac (both academic and general) searches. --Darkwind (talk) 22:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — --Darkwind (talk) 22:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — --Darkwind (talk) 22:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —AllyD (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Judging from this, Paradox is a "sub-network" of the European League of Institutes of the Arts, and judging from the Tuning Document that they produced, Paradox was then operating within the Erasmus-funded "inter}artes" thematic network. It would be useful to confirm these linkages, but they would suggest an upmerge into the ELIA article? AllyD (talk) 10:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:34, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Judging from this "an independent network of artists, curators, researchers and other academics involved in running and/or teaching Fine Art courses at University level", this network is obviously non notable. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 18:26, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Upmerge into European League of Institutes of the Arts. Beagel (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Upmerge into European League of Institutes of the Arts or Delete no third party sourcesCurb Chain (talk) 12:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Meets CSD A7. The article does not even assert the significance of the subject. causa sui (talk) 16:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.