Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyper Island
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 10:54, 3 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 10:54, 3 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. @pple complain 21:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hyper Island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Educational company with no evidence of notability, border-line spam. Albacore (talk) 22:09, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, may qualify under CSD G11. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 22:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, seems to be the leftover from the elimination of a copyvio from 2010. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless problems are fixed promptly. It wouldn't qualify for G11, because there's clean in the history ([1]; it was pretty much speediable as an A7 at that time, but A7 has traditionally not been applied to schools), but there has been no effort to add any sourcing to establish that this school is notable and it seems quite likely that the series of single purpose accounts who continually copy content from official pages are using it to advertise. Given the fact that advertising copy from the school has been added to this article twice since the article was last cleaned and that the article had 101 spam & copyvio filled edits before that, I suspect that if the article is deleted salting may be necessary to get the various SPAs to listen. Otherwise, they are simply likely to continue recreating the article as primary-sourced spam. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Tomas e (talk) 12:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.