Talk:Amygdalin
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
"the slickest, most sophisticated, and certainly the most remunerative cancer quack promotion in medical history"
In which way would sb. earn money by telling people to eat apple seeds? By selling apples or apple seeds? This claim is ridiculous and patently absurd. Chemical cancer medications often cost hundreds of thousands of dollars per patient ... So which is more "remunerative"? -- Alexey Topol (talk) 12:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Falsely marketing a semi-synthetic version of a naturally occurring compound as a "vitamin" that cures all forms of cancer was a profitable operation.[1]
- But nowhere near as profitable as falsely marketing poisonous substances as cancer cures like the pharma industry does on a large scale today. -- Alexey Topol (talk) 17:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Alexey Topol: You fail WP:PROFRINGE, WP:MEDRS and WP:ADVOCACY. Tgeorgescu (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- You lack common sense and good judgement. Have a nice day. -- Alexey Topol (talk) 20:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Found someone whose stupidity quacks described in this article earned money off. 93.103.223.236 (talk) 17:26, 4 February 2022 (UTC)