Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shauna Jacobson
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:24, 7 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:24, 7 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Shauna Jacobson[edit]
- Shauna Jacobson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Long service and sad death, yes, but local newspapers mentioning her doth not general notability make. Ironholds (talk) 00:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. From the article, I can derive that she was a cop, and she and her husband died while drunk in a DUI accident on a motorcycle - and the investigation cost US$50K. That's not at all notable, and this article is an obituary for a couple of dead DUIs. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Reading the entry, I can envision it somehow being sourced in a manner to show notability, but I'm not seeing it here. DSZ (talk) 02:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete <300 g-hits, mostly to Facebook, Classmates and other memorials. Sad, but not notable. Matt Deres (talk) 02:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 03:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- To Dennis the kitty cat, I would just like to say you are very disrespectful towards the issue, towards the family and you act like you are above us in the sense that you have never made a mistake. When you serve as an officer for 20 years, get a leadership award named after you and become the first high-rank officer for your gender/race/age etc, holler at me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Opcrm (talk • contribs) 22:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not here to debate morality or respect, I'm here to debate notability. My commentary still stands. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Your morality and respect are inadequate, there is no debate. This is notable. Only one person is the first female commander in APD history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Opcrm (talk • contribs) 05:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This was very much a local incident, and the article is essentially a memorial to the subject. There is no assertion of notability. Karanacs (talk) 15:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
-Just because something is local doesn't mean it isn't notable. Shauna Jacobson's life and achievments are more notable than most peoples'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Opcrm (talk • contribs) 03:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.