Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Peek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Peek[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable business person with no significant coverage. Only real claim here is working for CIT group and being married to Liz Peek. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable, as per WP:NOTINHERITED the notability of Peek's employer and wife do not confer notability on himself.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Very substantial coverage in lots of media over many years. I've linked here to some for your convenience. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very numerous, not substantive. Most sources that turn up for Peek are either press releases about his joining CIT group, or are about how he destroyed the CIT.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very numerous and very substantive. There are articles about his career and getting passed over for CEO position at Merrill Lynch. Articles on his taking on the CEO role at CIT Group in 2003. Articles on problems at CIT Group and his departure from the firm in 2009. Articles revisiting his tenure leading up to the financial crisis and company's bailing out. Articles on his later joining Bank of America. All subatantial and about this subject. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 17:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 17:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:GNG -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 07:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Based on...? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:12, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

a 30 second google search. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 16:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

.... and for, in the words of Full Metal Jacket, screwing the American economy up the ass and not have the goddam courtesy to give the country a reacharound. Have a look at the article now. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. If nothing else, there are multiple targets to redirect to (Liz Peek and CIT Group) which really makes keeping the only option left. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing shows rising to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

....except running a major investment bank into the ground. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per expansion, new referencing. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. CEOs of famoys companies are generally notable, and there's enough specifics for him in particular . DGG ( talk ) 23:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.