Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Meppen-Walter
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:02, 8 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:02, 8 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:22, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Courtney Meppen-Walter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was previously deleted by PROD and then re-created by a new user. Fails WP:GNG (due to lack of significant coverage) and WP:NFOOTBALL (has not played in a fully-professional league). Coverage of his crime comes under the remit of WP:BLP1E and WP:N/CA. GiantSnowman 10:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - He obviously fails WP:NSPORT, having never played in a fully pro league, and I agree with nominator's assessment regarding general notability. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 00:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it's not notable. --MicroX (talk) 22:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - He's not notable for his criminal offences, and he's not notable for his football. Bottom line: he's not notable. – PeeJay 00:06, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- He has never been a professional footballer, only an apprentice. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:38, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.