Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Menjívar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. JohnCD (talk) 15:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel Menjívar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. Was originally nominated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Óscar Céren, but since Óscar Céren clearly meets WP:NSPORT, it was more convenient to start a new nomination. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following article for similar reasons, though it was not listed in the first afd. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both - appear to fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Neither have played senior international football, nor in an FPL. No indication of any wider achievements garnering significant coverage. Fenix down (talk) 16:05, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both: Both clearly fail WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 16:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of El Salvador-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.