Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheena Sujan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 12:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sheena Sujan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't believe she meets WP:NACTOR. According to IMDB (Yes, not a reliable source) all the films she has been in have been short films Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Don't understand what's her achievement to have an article in Wikipedia. Now its a trend among celebrities to get a Wikipedia article on their name which is very bad for Wikipedia's quality and standards. Fails WP:NMODEL/WP:NACTOR. Athachil (talk) 06:16, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and comment - While I concur, after having done searches, that this person is not notable and pretty much looks to fail notability criteria, it is possibly just a bit off to compare her to a topless model (ie a Page 3 person) as I'm not seeing she's done this kind of softcore porn modelling. (Of course, the term may mean something different to its British meaning.) Mabalu (talk) 22:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I used term "page 3" to refer the metropolitan celebrities. In India the meaning of "Page 3 is" different Page 3 culture. I have updated my comment accordingly.Athachil (talk) 06:16, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many apologies for the misunderstanding, User:Athachil! Language barrier strikes! Mabalu (talk) 18:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.