Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khazar Ibrahim
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:35, 9 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Subject is clearly notable, although references should be added. Tijuana Brass 00:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Khazar Ibrahim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I deleted this article after an expired PROD period of 5 days; I have been approached by the first author of the article indicating that they contest the PROD. The period expiry was recent, so I thought it appropriate to restore the article and bring it here. The person who nominated the article for deletion via PROD stated: "sub-stub, and only questionably notable: is he the only spokesman, on what issues, who covers him, etc. Also not what we need by way of blp; we don't even know when or where he was born". User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 19:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 19:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I see 2,400 hits on Google. Mind you this is just the English spelling and not the Azerbaijani or Cyrillic spelling - both are used in Azerbaijan. Being a spokes person behalf of a Government makes a person inherently notable for at least holding this high level governmental post - consider Tony Snow. I created the article over a redlink while I was working on Fall 2007 clashes in Hakkari in hopes someone else would eventually expand it. An anon did make 2 edits for example introducing the date of birth and some educational history. Article only lasted about a week and needs more time in my view to develop. -- Cat chi? 19:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Cat. Let's be careful to avoid systemic bias. Phil Bridger 14:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Valid. Kingturtle 17:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.