Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winter Garden Squeeze
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Florida Collegiate Summer League. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Winter Garden Squeeze[edit]
- Winter Garden Squeeze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a minor sports teams lacking available sources. Fails WP:ORG. - MrX 16:40, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 01:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I'm inclined to say keep on this one, as summer collegiate league teams have generally been created and kept without issue in the past. Alex (talk) 15:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but doesn't change whether or not this is notable. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Florida Collegiate Summer League - A useful redirect to the league, but no evidence of notability as a team. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect as per Bushranger. Quick check of sources found some discussion in a local paper, plus a few references like this one in the West Orange Times, and I am not sure if these are sufficient to meet the general notability guideline.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.