Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2158 (Sevenoaks) Squadron Air Training Corp
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:16, 12 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 03:16, 12 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 2158 (Sevenoaks) Squadron Air Training Corp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cadet training squadrons are not notable per previous AfD discussions, contested prod MilborneOne (talk) 21:42, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MilborneOne (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. MilborneOne (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete there's a longstanding consensus that individual cadet units are generally not notable, and this doesn't appear to be one of the exceptions. The article doesn't assert the unit's notability, and so could have been deleted under CSD A7 by the way. Nick-D (talk) 08:59, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Individual cadet units are not notable. Most regular company-sized units would not be notable either. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:43, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Many thanks to the three users above for all your work maintaining wikipedia, I'll accept your judgement and leave the creation of pages to those who know what they are doing in the future — Preceding unsigned comment added by Innuendo121 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Clearly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:00, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.