Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Amici

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Denis Amici

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A mayor in an Italian town, individual appears to be non-notable per Wikipedia standards. Very little online that would prove notability. Other than being a mayor, no mentions whatsoever. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 04:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Head of state of a sovereign state. San Marino may be small, but he still easily meets WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

San Marino is not an "Italian town" — it's a sovereign independent state in its own right, and its Captains Regent are its national heads of state. So he's not a non-notable mayor; he's a notable equivalent to a president or prime minister of a country that has those offices. Some referencing improvement is still needed, absolutely, but WP:NPOL is satisfied here. Speedy keep. Bearcat (talk) 17:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As said by Necrothesp and Bearcat, he isn't a mayor, rather the equivalent to a president. Captains-Regent of San Marino are the highest office in that country and are not equivalent to mayors (that instead would go to the heads of the nine municipalities of the sovereign state). All other Captains-Regent since 2003 (except for Nicola Renzi, who was recently installed) have their own articles. Mr.Bob.298 (talk) 23:45, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.