Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dillon Rupp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dillon Rupp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability / "TOOSOON" concerns. Being No. 1 on the iTunes hip hop charts for two days (per [1]) doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC. Apart from the existing references, which I don't feel establish notability, I find a bit of very-low-quality gossip coverage [2]. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not yet meet the notability guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A couple of mentions, not enough indepth stuff, agree it is TOOSOON. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:GNG, WP:NMUSIC. Quis separabit? 03:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:11, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable...TOOSOON, needs more time to incubate. ^{Atsme📞📧} 17:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.