Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal Republic of Lostisland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete WP:CSD#A7 no credible claim of significance or importance. JohnCD (talk) 11:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Republic of Lostisland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded and deprodded with a claim the problem had been dealt with but my rationale for prodding still stands, namely: Not notable. Dubious claim to notability (created by a schoolgirl one day) and a search turns up no evidence establishing notability, while the refs do nothing for it either. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 01:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - enough secondary sources to qualify article's subject as a notable. --Ochilov (talk) 01:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be interested what those secondary sources are mentioned above, because I'm not seeing them on the page and can't find anything elsewhere. JMWt (talk) 08:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. No indication of notability. No reliable secondary sources. The listed sources are self-published, blog posts, and Google Books results that are inaccessible, but with descriptions reading "This book consists of articles from Wikia or other free sources online". Citobun (talk) 08:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.